Teams

Payne Park Huelster

2024 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Summer Weekday · 6.5 W Thursday EVE

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-05vs SSC Ross/PyserLost 01
L#1 DoublesPrentiss McNeill / Carolyn Rovner vs Lynette Fritz / Stephanie Miles0-6, 2-6
2024-08-25vs SSC Ross/PyserLost 02
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Rovner / Pamela Huelster vs Trisha Moslin / Alina Fotache4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Hackney / Michelle Shiver vs Carola Ross / Zora Trujic6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-25vs SSC Ross/PyserLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Hackney / Nancy Lagnese vs Amy DiSalvo / Zora Trujic0-6, 6-7
2024-07-11vs SSC Ross/PyserLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonna Hackney / Ann Hollins vs Stephanie Miles / Viviane Dainesi4-6, 4-6
2024-06-20vs SSC Ross/PyserLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Knight / Carolyn Rovner vs Trisha Moslin / Viviane Dainesi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Hackney / Pamela Huelster vs Lynette Fritz / Susan Mihm4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Thursday EVE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Bonita Fyala
published 3.5
3.33
Inna Pomares
published
3.25
Carolyn Rovner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Prentiss McNeill
published
3.20
Melissa Stanley
published
3.02
Pamela Huelster
published
3.00
Teresa Knight
published
2.53
Ann Hollins
published 3
Donna Hackney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Shiver
published
Nancy Lagnese
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Shiver + Pamela Huelster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bonita Fyala
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Inna Pomares
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
89%11%<1%
3.33
3.5
Carolyn Rovner
27W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Prentiss McNeill
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.23
Melissa Stanley
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
Pamela Huelster
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Teresa Knight
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Ann Hollins
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.53
Donna Hackney
17W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Shiver
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Lagnese
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.