Teams

Green 40+ 6.5 Combo

2026 Southern Combo Doubles 40 & Over - HSV · 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.20 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-20vs Smith 40+ HSV 6.5 ComboWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Pant / Ginger Green vs Brittnee Robinson / Laura Boothe6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDianne Higginbotham / Melissa Jose vs Christina Caprio-smith / Christy Wimberly6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAngelique Johnson / LASHONDA SMITH vs Paytee Beddingfield / Lynnae Hall6-1, 6-0
2026-08-10vs LoomisWon 30
W#1 DoublesTahirih Lackey / Carolina Curry vs Kimberley Loomis / Jennifer Helton6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmanda Flood / Kristin Wilson vs Laddawan Spicer / Melissa Haynes6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMelissa Jose / Lisa Pant vs Philippa Bianca / Lynn Dingo6-3, 6-0
2026-08-05vs Creager 6.5 40+ 2026Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLASHONDA SMITH / Jill Mellott vs Ryan Cate Gibson / Shannon Lindig3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Jose / Katie Bosarge Patterson vs Shannon Orr / Patty Laughlin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichell Ford / Lisa Pant vs Lynne Reynolds / Christine Mannor5-7, 4-6
2026-07-30vs DiFranco 6.5 Combo 40+Won 30
W#1 DoublesDiana Hurewitz / Katie Bosarge Patterson vs Laura Collins / Jennifer Pease6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Jose / Carolina Curry vs Elizabeth Sudderth / Robin DiFranco6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAmanda Flood / Dianne Higginbotham vs Ellie Sternberg Lastinger / Melissa Bryant6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Moorer 40+ 6.5 combo3063979
2Creager 6.5 40+ 20263193898
3Green 40+ 6.5 Combo2163663
4DiFranco 6.5 Combo 40+225715117
5Loomis135717124
6Smith 40+ HSV 6.5 Combo0421021130

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Diana Hurewitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Tahirih Lackey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Amanda Flood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Ginger Green
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
LASHONDA SMITH
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Melissa Jose
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Maranatha Brackett
published
2.94
Carolina Curry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Katie Bosarge Patterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Michell Ford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Lisa Pant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Angelique Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Jill Mellott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Dianne Higginbotham
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angelique Johnson + Jill Mellott8259% games+4.7% vs expected
Diana Hurewitz + Maranatha Brackett4255% games+1.8% vs expected
Lisa Pant + Michell Ford134 matchesnot enough data
LASHONDA SMITH + Michell Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Maranatha Brackett + Angelique Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Diana Hurewitz
71W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.71
Tahirih Lackey
26W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Amanda Flood
30W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Ginger Green
96W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.30
LASHONDA SMITH
22W–44L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Melissa Jose
94W–88L career · 9 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.20
Maranatha Brackett
57W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Carolina Curry
23W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Katie Bosarge Patterson
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Michell Ford
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
Lisa Pant
40W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Angelique Johnson
45W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
Jill Mellott
35W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Dianne Higginbotham
22W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.