Teams

5*RGoff-YMCA

2024 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men Wknd

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-26vs 1*JByrd-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohnathan Baddour / Jackson Naftel vs Akihiro Hamada / Andrew Perdue4-6, 5-7
2024-07-15vs 3*GDichter-CHTCWon 10
W#2 DoublesParv Mital / Ryan Berliner vs Gabriel Dichter / Chris Combs7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-07vs 4*MHanauer-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Baddour / Johnathan Baddour vs Robert Beier / Anil Chawla6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-06-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesSergii Porokh / Ryan Berliner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-20vs 2*KMoyung-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Sendor / Jackson Naftel vs Kevin Moyung / Luc Sanchez6-3, 6-2
2024-06-09vs 3*GDichter-CHTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJackson Naftel / Kenneth Nelson vs Ty Bullard / Boyd Blackburn3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesParv Mital / David Baddour vs Gabriel Dichter / Chris Combs7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Parv Mital
published
4.34
Rawle Sue-Ho
published
4.33
Tyler Carroll
published
4.25
William Sendor
published
4.21
Kenneth Nelson
published
4.18
Jackson Naftel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
David Baddour
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Ryan Berliner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
William Enright
published
3.42
Ryan Goff
published
Reid Lerner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Carroll + Rawle Sue-Ho8066% games+8.9% vs expected
David Baddour + Ryan Berliner3351% gamesnot enough data
David Baddour + Jackson Naftel4248% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Berliner + Jackson Naftel044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Parv Mital
26W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
Rawle Sue-Ho
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
4.34
Tyler Carroll
22W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
4.33
William Sendor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
4.25
Kenneth Nelson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Jackson Naftel
66W–59L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
4
David Baddour
124W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%12%
3.83
4
Ryan Berliner
113W–104L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
William Enright
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.58
Ryan Goff
13W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
Reid Lerner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.