Teams

Central Austin Dudes

Spring Adult 18 & Over WeekEND · Men's 3.0 18s

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-25vs BanditosWon 10
W#1 SinglesChris Stansbury vs Jon Anderson7-5, 6-0
2022-06-12vs Berry Next Point 3.0 18sWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Stansbury / STAN WONG vs Robb Matthews / John Moore6-4, 6-3
2022-06-05vs Net WarriorsWon 10
W#1 SinglesChris Stansbury vs Erik Tran6-2, 6-0
2022-05-22vs Hold My BeerWon 10
W#1 SinglesChris Stansbury vs Derek Krause7-6, 6-4
2022-05-15vs MarcoWon 10
W#1 SinglesChris Stansbury vs Andrew Kuen6-0, 6-1
2022-04-24vs Over-Served @ RPCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Stansbury / Mark Sullivan vs Chad Hawk / Ryan Mouritzen6-1, 7-6
2022-04-10vs Servin' BourbonWon 10
W#1 SinglesChris Stansbury vs Rob Beckham6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.0 18s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Chris Stansbury
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.28
Nathan Kinsman
published
3.18
Amir Shadlu
published 3.5
3.11
Steve Larkin
published
2.93
JAMES Corrigan
published 3
2.88
STAN WONG
published
Jaime Faunes
published 3
2.67
Dillon Buhl
published 3
2.44
Michael Bradley
published
2.40
William DeLauro
published
Robert James
published
Stephen Hochstetler
published
Steve McMillen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amir Shadlu + Chris Stansbury11857% games+13.1% vs expected
Amir Shadlu + Steve Larkin111450% games−1.3% vs expected
Stephen Hochstetler + Robert James3344% gamesnot enough data
Dillon Buhl + Robert James3256% gamesnot enough data
Steve McMillen + Robert James314 matchesnot enough data
Steve McMillen + Stephen Hochstetler213 matchesnot enough data
Dillon Buhl + Jaime Faunes123 matchesnot enough data
Dillon Buhl + William DeLauro123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Stansbury
71W–55L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
Nathan Kinsman
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Amir Shadlu
47W–50L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
Steve Larkin
20W–29L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
JAMES Corrigan
33W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
STAN WONG
7W–41L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Jaime Faunes
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Dillon Buhl
19W–32L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.67
Michael Bradley
10W–40L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
William DeLauro
11W–35L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
Robert James
26W–32L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Hochstetler
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Steve McMillen
10W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.