Teams

GSTL40/Henderson/Stables

2025 Mixed 40 & Over- GSTL · 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-20vs GSTL40/Phillips/DunesLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrenda Curtin / Richard Conaway vs Jennifer Phillips / Gabriel Phillips2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBelinda Foster / John Ahearn vs Sandra Valentine / Jay Bonnoitt0-6, 1-6
2025-06-29vs GSTL40/Phillips/DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesKenneth Parker / Mary Cannon vs Sarah Prinzi / Robert Prinzi6-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesRichard Conaway / Kathy Henderson vs Susan Brady / John Charles Sandoz6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJoseph Boyle / Deana Jowers vs Kimberly Gore / Steve Kahn6-1, 6-3
2025-05-28vs GSTL40/Phillips/DunesLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Henderson / Kenneth Parker vs Jennifer Phillips / Gabriel Phillips5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Conaway / Lynda Carter vs Maryann Gaddy / Josh Gaddy4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Gale / Barbara Sullivan vs Susan Brady / Charles Jordan3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Petruniak
published 3.5
2.92
Brenda Curtin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Richard Conaway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Lynda Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Kathy Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Mary Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Belinda Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Deana Jowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
James Gale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Ahearn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kenneth Parker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Kenny
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Petruniak
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Brenda Curtin
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Richard Conaway
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.89
Lynda Carter
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Kathy Henderson
9W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Mary Cannon
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Belinda Foster
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Deana Jowers
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
James Gale
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
John Ahearn
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kenneth Parker
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Kenny
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.