← Teams

MPRC-Hayashi/Peters

2020 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 2.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Keibun Hayashi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Feng-Yu Liu
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Results7 ties
2019-11-23Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesKeibun Hayashi / JAMES PETERS vs Thomas Ruess / Marvin Lee6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesFeng-Yu Liu / James Moreland vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-11-16Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesKeibun Hayashi / Feng-Yu Liu vs Kerry Sweet / John Slominski6-1, 6-4
2019-11-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJAMES PETERS / Feng-Yu Liu vs Jack Crossen / Dave Sato6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKeibun Hayashi / Stan Smith vs Steve Straub / Richard Eaton6-3, 6-3
2019-10-20Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesKeibun Hayashi / Lew Woods vs Wes Milligan / Arkadiy Boyarshinov7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2019-10-11Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesKeibun Hayashi / JAMES PETERS vs Ian Rogers / Brad Mathewson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDarryl Walters / Feng-Yu Liu vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-10-06Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMatt Landrum / Feng-Yu Liu vs Arvid Anderson / John Bala6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2019-09-28Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesKeibun Hayashi / Darryl Walters vs Robert Adatto / Frank Brown6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Keibun Hayashi
32W–84L career
not enough data
—
2.5
Feng-Yu Liu
13W–29L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.