Teams

SD 3.0 La Jolla TC (3:1)/ Bruno

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0 WD

7 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-24vs SD 3.0 La Jolla B&TC (2:2)/ KhouryLost 01
L#1 SinglesJessica Shehab vs Paige Kratz7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-03-06vs SD 3.0 La Jolla B&TC (2:2)/ KhouryLost 12
W#1 DoublesJessica Shehab / Christiana Thieler vs Stacey Gotfredson / Sarah Blumenthal6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAmy Airom vs Paige Kratz2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Bruno / Mariko Uyeda vs Wendy Marchbanks / Amy Ragen7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-27vs SD 3.0 Mtn View (3:1)/ StanleyWon 20
W#1 SinglesAmy Airom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJessica Shehab / Mariko Uyeda vs Amy Bondoc / Teresa Vega6-1, 6-0
2023-02-13vs SD 3.0 SDTRC (2:2)/ Yu- HansenWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Bruno / Jessica Shehab vs Elizabeth Yu-Hansen / Avelina Kauffman3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Airom vs Anna Thomas6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMariko Uyeda / Christine Cernosia vs Jodi Tart / Kate Gill6-4, 7-6
2023-02-07vs SD 3.0 Coronado TC (2:2)/ ArthurWon 10
W#1 DoublesJessica Shehab / Mariko Uyeda vs Corrine Lott / Alexandra Murillo6-1, 6-1
2023-02-06vs SD 3.0 Coronado TC (2:2)/ VermehrenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAmy Airom vs Meagan McKissick3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Shehab / Mariko Uyeda vs Susan Storm / Marlis Vermehren6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-09vs SD WD LLW 3.0 Peninsula TC/ WoodSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Cernosia / Jessica Shehab vs Au-Co MAI / Michelle VANN6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Airom vs Malinda Marsh7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Sarah Bruno
published
3.45
Jessica Shehab
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Mariko Uyeda
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Amy Airom
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.97
Christiana Thieler
published 3.5
2.78
Andrea Evans
published 3
2.74
Yumi Miyamoto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Bruno + Jessica Shehab6457% games+6.1% vs expected
Jessica Shehab + Mariko Uyeda8361% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Bruno + Mariko Uyeda314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Bruno
21W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Jessica Shehab
82W–42L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Mariko Uyeda
64W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Amy Airom
55W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Christiana Thieler
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Andrea Evans
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
Yumi Miyamoto
20W–16L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.