Teams

MPTC - Love All

Adult 18 & Over 2.5W - 5.0+ Women's Tuesday Night · 5.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 5.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-26vs MPTC - Valentine-KingSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNeha Shaw / Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Alex Kornajcik / Elizabeth Crider1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJada Hill vs Marissa Valentine-King6-7, 1-6
2026-05-19vs MPTC - Valentine-KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesAgnese Rozite / Jada Hill vs Elizabeth Crider / Sidney Stewart3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAbby Dennett vs Hannah Watson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNeha Shaw / Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli vs Crystal Fain / Kimberly Elliott6-3, 6-4
2026-05-12vs MPTC - Valentine-KingLost 01
L#1 SinglesAbby Dennett vs Marina Vigil Celorio4-6, 6-7
2026-05-05vs MPTC - Valentine-KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesAbby Dennett / Neha Shaw vs Alex Kornajcik / Lauren Gutterman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAgnese Rozite vs Hannah Watson6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJada Hill / Chanel Glasper vs Crystal Fain / Megan Wnuk1-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs MPTC - Valentine-KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesChanel Glasper / Ofelia Rodriguez vs Marissa Valentine-King / Lauren Gutterman0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAgnese Rozite vs Marina Vigil Celorio3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesNeha Shaw / Abby Dennett vs Sidney Stewart / Megan Wnuk6-4, 7-6
2026-04-14vs MPTC - Valentine-KingLost 12
L#1 DoublesJada Hill / Chanel Glasper vs Lauren Gutterman / Marina Vigil Celorio0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNeha Shaw vs Melissa Ariza6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesAbby Dennett / Rachel Howie vs Marissa Valentine-King / Kimberly Elliott5-7, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.30 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Agnese Rozite
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.67
Neha Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
4.55
Chanel Glasper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.38
Shelby Fillingame
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
4.34
Rachel Howie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
Abby Dennett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 5
4.08
Ofelia Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.88
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Jada Hill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neha Shaw + Abby Dennett17362% games+10.1% vs expected
Abby Dennett + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli4253% games+9.7% vs expected
Neha Shaw + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli4154% games−0.4% vs expected
Shelby Fillingame + Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Agnese Rozite
7W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.78
Neha Shaw
36W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
5
Chanel Glasper
0W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
Shelby Fillingame
65W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
4.38
Rachel Howie
59W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
4.34
5
Abby Dennett
40W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.27
Ofelia Rodriguez
1W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
4.08
Maria Gabriela Graterol Stefanelli
44W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.88
Jada Hill
1W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.