Teams

McDowell/Chattanooga

2026 Adult 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-09vs Vachon-Lau/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesTom McCullough / Tom Thatcher vs Benny Ashley / Jeff McBrayer1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWesley Alexander / Scott Hamlin vs Wayne Albergotti / Joseph Richard4-6, 3-6
2026-05-07vs Vachon-Lau/ChattanoogaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesScott Hamlin / Tom McCullough vs Dave Dameron / Benny Ashley4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesWesley Alexander / John Biondolillo vs Bob Lype / Scott Higgins2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Vachon-Lau/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesWesley Alexander / Tom Thatcher vs Dave Dameron / Jeff McBrayer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTom McCullough / Barry Brooks vs Joe Buckley / Joseph Richard2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJohn Biondolillo / Scott Hamlin vs Terry Bartley / Marc Rubinstein1-6, 2-6
2026-04-25vs Vachon-Lau/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesJohn Davis / John Biondolillo vs Tony Bartley / Joseph Richard2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesWesley Alexander / Tom Thatcher vs Joe Buckley / Wayne Albergotti4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBarry Brooks / Tom McCullough vs Reggie Vachon / Bob Lype5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2026-04-12vs Vachon-Lau/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Hamlin / Wesley Alexander vs Scott Higgins / Terry Bartley2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTom McCullough / John Biondolillo vs Tony Bartley / Marc Rubinstein3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTom Thatcher / John Davis vs Reggie Vachon / Joe Buckley5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Douglas McDowell
published 3.5
Barry Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Tom Thatcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Scott Hamlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
John Biondolillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Tom McCullough
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Wesley Alexander
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wesley Alexander + Scott Hamlin0531% games−15.1% vs expected
Barry Brooks + Tom McCullough033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Douglas McDowell
12W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Barry Brooks
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Thatcher
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.24
Scott Hamlin
2W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
John Biondolillo
7W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Tom McCullough
6W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.98
Wesley Alexander
5W–35L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.