Teams

Open/Knoxville

2023 Mixed 18 & Over-Knoxville · 8.0 Mixed 18&over

6 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-29vs BrowningClarke/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndy Gerdt / Jordan Peters vs Rachel Kimmel / Nicholas Vantrease1-6, 3-6
2023-07-23vs Kirby/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Elison / Andy Gerdt vs Jeremy Tanarungsekul / Tiffany Webb1-6, 4-6
2023-07-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Elison / Andy Gerdt vs Eli MacOn / Sarah Warren6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-07-15vs BrowningClarke/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndy Gerdt / Lynn Johnson vs Katie Rymer / Baylor Anders3-6, 1-6
2023-07-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndy Gerdt / Emily Elison vs Tony Lee / Kim Lee7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18&over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Andy Gerdt
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.84
Kathrine Klenske
published
Davis Luna
published 4
3.59
Emily Elison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.44
Lisa Gangelhoff
published
Jacob Hoheisel
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andy Gerdt
56W–78L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
Kathrine Klenske
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Davis Luna
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Emily Elison
172W–110L career · 12 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Lisa Gangelhoff
8W–29L career · no lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.44
3.5
Jacob Hoheisel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.