Teams

NWO 18&Over 3.0W Damschroder-Bedford

2022 NWO Adult 18 & Over Night · NWO Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesYasmeen Moore / Elle Hurst vs Peggy Kelley / Marti Price2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Kurek vs Lesline Sims5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBrianna Johnson / Cassandra Dreslinski vs Mary Longo / Jennifer DeGroot5-7, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChelsea Abalos vs Brandi Laurita6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKristy Kagy / Sarah Skow vs Diane Fultz / Heather Boissoneault6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesElle Hurst vs Stefanie Calderone3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDefne Apul / Yasmeen Moore vs Sally Copeland / Mary Bryant6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMelissa Kurek vs Holly Newcomer6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCassandra Dreslinski / Brianna Johnson vs Linda Torbet / Manzetta Jackson6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NWO Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Matt Damschroder
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 4
2.78
Sarah Skow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brianna Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Deanna Kline
published 3
Emily Kessinger
published 3
Defne Apul
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.22
Elle Hurst
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Cassandra Dreslinski
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Chelsea Abalos
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Kristy Kagy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Kurek
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Yasmeen Moore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Skow + Brianna Johnson2448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matt Damschroder
148W–91L career · 9 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
Sarah Skow
28W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Brianna Johnson
20W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Deanna Kline
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Emily Kessinger
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Defne Apul
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Elle Hurst
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%98%2%
2.22
Cassandra Dreslinski
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Chelsea Abalos
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kristy Kagy
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Kurek
12W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yasmeen Moore
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.