Teams

2024 Combo 2.5 HCC-Langford

2024 Combo Doubles 18&Over-PB · Women 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-01vs Canebrake 2.5 EvansWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hanson / Mary Hays vs Renee Koenenn / Heather Moss2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Queck / Hannah Taninbaum vs Aimee Cotton / Wyn Payne7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLauren McWilliams / Lindsay Glover vs Cher Evans / Sherry Breland6-0, 6-1
2024-09-22vs Fins 2.5 Combo-HennesseySplit 11
L#1 DoublesChelle Langford / Amanda Stephens vs McKenzie Woodard / Ashtyn Walker5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesYancy Popicg / Candace Baye vs Jessica Shemper / Mary Kathryn Burge6-0, 6-1
2024-09-07vs Northwood 2.5-NorthamWon 30
W#1 DoublesChelle Langford / Yancy Popicg vs Jenn Northam / April Cardwell5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmanda Hanson / Mary Hays vs Amanda Snowden / Mary Lauren Deweese6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Queck / Hannah Taninbaum vs Nancy Walton / Kerry Parker6-3, 6-4
2024-09-03vs Canebrake 2.5 EvansWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmanda Hanson / Mary Hays vs Leslie Elliott / Madison Howard4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesYancy Popicg / Amanda Stephens vs Heather Moss / Renee Koenenn6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesChelle Langford / Lauren McWilliams vs Lucy Blair / Wyn Payne7-5, 6-1
2024-08-20vs Fins 2.5 Combo-HennesseyWon 21
W#1 DoublesYancy Popicg / Candace Baye vs Kayla Holcomb / Lauren Pitts6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLauren McWilliams / Sarah Queck vs Lisa Stevens / Kaitlyn Hennessey2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Hanson / Amanda Stephens vs Kennedi Fantroy / Jessica Shemper6-4, 6-2
2024-08-14vs Northwood 2.5-NorthamLost 12
W#1 DoublesChelle Langford / Candace Baye vs April Cardwell / Amanda Snowden7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMary Hays / Amanda Hanson vs Isabel Hall / Juliet Mcdonald7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLauren McWilliams / Hannah Taninbaum vs Jenn Northam / Mary Lauren Deweese2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Yancy Popicg
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
2.72
Candace Baye
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.64
Chelle Langford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Amanda Stephens
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.38
Amanda Hanson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.37
Sarah Queck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Lauren McWilliams
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.99
Hannah Taninbaum
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Hays
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Queck + Hannah Taninbaum314 matchesnot enough data
Chelle Langford + Yancy Popicg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yancy Popicg
24W–5L career · 11 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Candace Baye
33W–15L career · 10 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Chelle Langford
41W–23L career · 12 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Amanda Stephens
10W–7L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Amanda Hanson
12W–5L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
0%81%19%
2.38
Sarah Queck
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.37
Lauren McWilliams
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Hannah Taninbaum
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Mary Hays
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.