← Teams

MAC-Dineen

2019 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP 2.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
—
Harshi Waters
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Results7 ties
2019-03-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesErin Dineen / Barbara Gram vs Janet Gilkey / Stacy Naccachian4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGulgun Mersereau / Harshi Waters vs Claudia Mills / Barb Wilson6-0, 6-2
2019-03-10Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesErin Dineen / Harshi Waters vs Nancy Yen Shipley / Desiree Bliss6-4, 6-2
2019-03-08Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMelissa Jacobs / Harshi Waters vs Monica Olson / Lisa McConachie2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2019-02-20Split 1–1
L#1 SinglesBarbara Gram vs Lisa McConachie7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLisa Henshaw / Harshi Waters vs Jill Boyce / Yayun Tung6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2019-02-01Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesBarbara Gram vs Carmen Timberlake6-2, 6-3
2019-01-25Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesBarbara Gram vs Heather Dale6-1, 6-2
2019-01-11Lost 0–1
L#1 SinglesBarbara Gram vs Dana Austin6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89
2.5
Harshi Waters
22W–25L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.