Teams

Co.Wilkins18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-25vs Pr.Chandrasekhar18AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJ Wilbur Dotson / John Kasner vs Joshua Franceschina / Rodney Kitner6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-21vs Pr.Chandrasekhar18ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesJohn Kasner / J Wilbur Dotson vs Matthew Rowe / Jake McCartney1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesConnor Wilkins / Aneesh Kodali vs Rohan Chandrasekhar / Joshua Franceschina7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-19vs Be.Koren18AWon 10
W#1 SinglesGrant McGrew vs Nicolas Rose6-1, 6-2
2024-04-28vs Be.Koren18AWon 10
W#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Phillip Cardella vs Garrett Frank / Nicolas Rose6-0, 6-1
2024-04-15Split 11
W#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Nick Brittis vs Jon Davis / Rodney Kitner0-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJ Wilbur Dotson vs Klein Evans2-6, 3-6
2024-04-07vs Be.Koren18AWon 20
W#1 DoublesGrant McGrew / Connor Wilkins vs Nicolas Rose / Jason Kinder6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesPhillip Cardella vs Garrett Frank6-3, 6-3
2024-03-17vs Be.Koren18ALost 01
L#1 DoublesWilliam Gray / Grant McGrew vs Jonathan Janda / Dan Parham1-6, 3-6
2024-03-10vs Pr.Chandrasekhar18ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Kasner / J Wilbur Dotson vs Brian Smith / Jon Davis6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Phillip Cardella vs Michael Holt / Ravi Tewari4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.54 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Justin Radloff
published
4.81
Grant McGrew
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.75
J Wilbur Dotson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 5
4.63
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.47
Phillip Cardella
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 5
4.40
Jonathan Hodges
published
4.39
Nick Brittis
published
4.31
Aneesh Kodali
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aneesh Kodali + Phillip Cardella213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Radloff
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Grant McGrew
92W–50L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.81
5
J Wilbur Dotson
32W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.75
5
Connor Wilkins
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.63
5
Phillip Cardella
30W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.47
Jonathan Hodges
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
4.40
Nick Brittis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
4.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.