Teams

NITA F 75CMXa Score-Thompson/Glod

2025 NITA4 Fall Combo Mixed · NITA F Combo Mixed 7.5 18&O

23 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesNorbert Glod / Leigh Champagne vs Kim Kuwabara / Thomas Strickler7-5, 4-3
W#2 DoublesJames Humpherson / Carolyn Humpherson vs Pauline Tuchscherer / Jim Vetrone4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-12-12vs NITA F 75CMXb NMHFC-Lawver/VenkusWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarie Reece / Karl Blase vs Carlos Canga-Arguelles / Yuko Suzuki2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTracy Reece / Parker Turnipseed vs Rita Lukey / Mariusz Cislak6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGenie Prokaski / Tanner Roach vs Michael Lawver / Kathy Malone6-4, 6-2
2025-12-05vs NITA F 75CMXe Rush Copley-KarpWon 30
W#1 DoublesOmar Montano / Genie Prokaski vs Amy Karp / Dalaney Street6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNorbert Glod / Margaret Weiss vs Alicia Yaeger / Navneet Eswar7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKarl Blase / Mary Sullivan vs John Yim / Cheryl Engle6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-11-23vs NITA F 75CMXe Rush Copley-KarpLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlison Miller / Mick Brennan vs Amy Karp / Dalaney Street6-7, 2-4
L#2 DoublesMarion Thompson / Michael Tribble vs Colleen Mumford / Byron Huang1-6, 1-6
2025-11-21vs NITA F 75CMXb NMHFC-Lawver/VenkusWon 21
W#1 DoublesGenie Prokaski / Tanner Roach vs Cristobal GARCIA / Sarah Campagna6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJonathan Gray / Marion Thompson vs Cody Schullo / Abigail Torres2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Humpherson / James Humpherson vs Chuck Narunatvanich / Laura Burns4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesMargaret Weiss / Omar Montano vs Joe Hillegass / Kara Levin6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarie Reece / Karl Blase vs Jazz Burks / Amanda Hanlon6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Humpherson / James Humpherson vs Terri Parse / Rob Castanares4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-25vs NITA F 75CMXb NMHFC-Lawver/VenkusLost 02
L#1 DoublesKarl Blase / Mary Sullivan vs Cody Schullo / Abigail Torres4-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMick Brennan / Genie Prokaski vs Daylen Davis / Marie Venckus0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-04vs NITA F 75CMXe Rush Copley-KarpWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarl Blase / Marie Reece vs Amy Karp / Dalaney Street6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael Herbert / Erica Karlson vs Mathew Philip / Alicia Yaeger6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMick Brennan / Alison Miller vs Charlie Turri / Julie Yim4-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesTanner Roach / Margaret Weiss vs Erica White / Rob Castanares5-7, 1-4
W#2 DoublesKarl Blase / Leigh Champagne vs Thomas Strickler / Andrea Zuckerman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNorbert Glod / Erica Karlson vs Kristin Lamb / Chris Massouras7-6, 3-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NITA F Combo Mixed 7.5 18&O have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Tracy Reece
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.17
Marie Reece
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.98
Omar Montano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Michael Herbert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alison Miller
published 4
3.68
Dan Burnette
published 4
3.66
Tanner Roach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Leigh Champagne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Mary Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Margaret Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Norbert Glod
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
Karl Blase
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.28
Erica Karlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Patricia Stifter
published 3.5
3.25
Genie Prokaski
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.17
Carolyn Humpherson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Parker Turnipseed
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Marion Thompson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
James Humpherson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jennifer Burnette
published
Michael Tribble
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mick Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Kubik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marion Thompson + Norbert Glod162248% games+8.6% vs expected
Michael Herbert + Margaret Weiss13066% games+6.0% vs expected
Marie Reece + Karl Blase9167% games+0.9% vs expected
Carolyn Humpherson + James Humpherson321854% gamesnot enough data
Marion Thompson + Parker Turnipseed4638% gamesnot enough data
Norbert Glod + Erica Karlson4453% gamesnot enough data
Marion Thompson + Mick Brennan0722% gamesnot enough data
Marie Reece + Norbert Glod5159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracy Reece
104W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
4.17
4
Marie Reece
177W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
4.17
Omar Montano
50W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.98
Michael Herbert
44W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Alison Miller
52W–101L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Dan Burnette
28W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Tanner Roach
18W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Leigh Champagne
64W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.65
4
Mary Sullivan
47W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Margaret Weiss
83W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
4
Norbert Glod
157W–147L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Karl Blase
48W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Erica Karlson
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Patricia Stifter
31W–19L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Genie Prokaski
60W–75L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Carolyn Humpherson
72W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
3
Parker Turnipseed
56W–67L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Marion Thompson
58W–187L career · 5 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.46
James Humpherson
42W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Burnette
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Tribble
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mick Brennan
13W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Kubik
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.