Teams

GT Bray Babes Who Hustle

2021 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

6 players · average NTRP 3.83 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesManda Jordan / Kelly Depalo vs Heidi Grimes / Kimberly Johnston3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElsa Trefil / Andrea Johnson vs Ann Lammers / Cindy Rosenberg2-6, 1-6
2021-06-12vs River Strand BarnardWon 20
W#1 DoublesManda Jordan / Kelly Depalo vs Nancy Finman / Kim Reiser6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElsa Trefil / Andrea Johnson vs Hattie Grimsley / Sherri Archondo4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-06-05vs LWR 40 LoveLost 02
L#2 DoublesJanine Dennis / Kelly Depalo vs Diana Stadelnikas / Betty Jo Zeigler6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElsa Trefil / Andrea Johnson vs Barbara Moore / Claudia Schwab6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesClaire Speir / Kelly Depalo vs Susan Rakay / Courtney Rosenthal6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2021-05-01vs LWR 40 LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Janine Dennis vs Karen Nicholson / Sheila Perry3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Johnson / Kelly Depalo vs Diana Stadelnikas / Victoria Reid3-6, 4-6
2021-04-24vs River Strand BarnardWon 20
W#2 DoublesJudith Lubbers / Janine Dennis vs Lorraine Breidenstein / Leslie Adkins6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMargaret Kirkland / Elsa Trefil vs Sylvia Sethares-Heyl / Colleen Kendle6-2, 6-2
2021-04-03vs Jacaranda Double TroubleLost 02
L#1 DoublesMonica Darold / Elsa Trefil vs SueAnn Sanders / Yvonne Ghilardi4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJanine Dennis / Judith Lubbers vs Kanjana Thomas / Annthonia Prossi6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Judith Lubbers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Kelly Depalo
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Nancy Cope
published
3.52
Elsa Trefil
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.41
Margaret Kirkland
published
3.16
Barbara Mire
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Depalo + Elsa Trefil1542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Judith Lubbers
220W–129L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Kelly Depalo
74W–104L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.66
Nancy Cope
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Elsa Trefil
71W–103L career · type A · 5 lines in 2021
43%57%<1%
3.52
Margaret Kirkland
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Barbara Mire
4W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.