Teams

Sanlando-Nguyen

2025 ORANGESEMINOLE Adult 18 & Over - WINTER Evenings · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_4

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-12vs Ft Gatlin-WuWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa van Smith / Pauline Peterkin vs Roxana Catrinacio / Lana Lyubimova6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesShaughna Watai vs Alle Shane7-5, 6-2
2025-03-05vs USTA Campus-LuterWon 10
W#1 SinglesShaughna Watai vs SOCISA NICOLE BAJA6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-02-12vs USTA Campus-MaiaWon 20
W#1 DoublesPauline Peterkin / Maria Boykin vs Andresa Maia / Oriana Torres6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesShaughna Watai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-05vs Ft Gatlin-WuWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Bravo / Pauline Peterkin vs Kiera Phoebus / Ashley Turner6-0, 6-2
2025-01-29vs USTA Campus-LuterWon 10
W#1 DoublesPamela Bravo / Pauline Peterkin vs Shara Lee / Michelle Lopez7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-26vs Lake Cane-HowlettWon 20
W#1 DoublesPauline Peterkin / Sophia Okubo vs Meghan Mannella / Jen Copeland6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesShaughna Watai vs Sarah Foleen6-1, 6-0
2025-01-12vs USTA Campus-MaiaWon 10
W#3 DoublesTerri Bigham / Shaughna Watai vs Marilyn Rankin / Christen Cousino6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Pamela Bravo
published
3.10
Pauline Peterkin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Sophia Okubo
published
2.97
Shaughna Watai
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3
2.92
Zhiyi Zhou
published
2.82
Suhei Fernandez
published
2.70
Lucida Xu
published
2.67
Terri Bigham
published
2.48
Kathy Friedle
published
Jamie Skalnican
published
Lisa van Smith
published
Sandra Zini
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lucida Xu + Zhiyi Zhou213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Bravo
26W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.49
3.5
Pauline Peterkin
78W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Sophia Okubo
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Shaughna Watai
44W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Zhiyi Zhou
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Suhei Fernandez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lucida Xu
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Terri Bigham
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Kathy Friedle
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.48
Jamie Skalnican
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa van Smith
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Zini
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.