Teams

Harlan 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Singles 18+ · 4.0 Women Singles

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesChristina Campbell vs Ann Martel6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesHolly Hinshelwood vs Kate Brittain1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesMelissa Beeson vs Olivia Linthavong1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesChristina Campbell vs Ashley Jones6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJulie Dover vs Amy Gilbert4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-17vs Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMLost 12
L#1 SinglesMelissa Beeson vs Kelly Gekas2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKim Hunt vs Kristin Williamson2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesMorgan Qubein vs Kerry Sunderland6-4, 6-0
2026-07-09vs Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesChristina Campbell vs Carrie McElvogue6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTracy Harlan vs Kerry Sunderland6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMelissa Beeson vs Kara Ray5-5
L#1 SinglesChristina Campbell vs Leslie Marus6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHolly Hinshelwood vs Layne Saunders3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesLeigh Abraham vs Olivia Linthavong7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-25vs Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesChristina Campbell vs Madison Bowen6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHolly Hinshelwood vs Melissa Goodman6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLeigh Abraham vs Kristin Williamson6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMorgan Qubein vs Leslie Marus1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHolly Hinshelwood vs Ann Martel6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesJulie Dover vs Kate Brittain1-6, 0-6
2026-05-30vs Ray 18s 4.0W Singles Thurs PMWon 21
L#1 SinglesTracy Harlan vs Carol Schuck Dillon1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJulie Dover vs Kara Ray6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKim Hunt vs Kerry Sunderland6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Christina Campbell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.86
Holly Hinshelwood
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.85
Leigh Abraham
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Julie Dover
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.64
Tracy Harlan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.64
Kim Hunt
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.64
Melissa Beeson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.61
Morgan Qubein
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Hunt + Tracy Harlan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Campbell
34W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Holly Hinshelwood
23W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
Leigh Abraham
29W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.85
Julie Dover
40W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Tracy Harlan
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Kim Hunt
222W–160L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Melissa Beeson
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Morgan Qubein
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.