Teams

King/Knoxville

2023 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-13vs English/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Suzanne Mubarak vs Courtney Hammontree / Michelle Uhlenhake7-5, 7-5
2023-05-06vs Smith-Martin/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs Lori DeRoos3-6, 4-6
2023-04-29vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#2 SinglesEmily Elison vs Erica Zuhr2-6, 2-6
2023-04-22vs English/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Elison / Karen Dail vs Debi English / Courtney Hammontree6-4, 6-4
2023-04-15vs Smith-Martin/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Elison / Kimberly Nelson vs Anita Downes / Ann Brady7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-08vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Elison / Karen Dail vs Belinda Gambuzza / Mindi Bowling3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesEmily Elison vs Amanda Blackwood6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Emily Elison
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.45
Jeanne Blake
published
3.42
Jennifer McVeigh
published
3.34
Kristin Monge
published
3.27
Suzanne Mubarak
published
3.24
Ann Curtin
published 3.5
3.21
Kelly Hollingsworth
published
3.02
Tamy Wilson
published
2.97
Kelley Karnes
published
2.90
Karen Dail
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Blake + Suzanne Mubarak5169% games+4.3% vs expected
Kristin Monge + Emily Elison303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Elison
136W–77L career · 6 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jeanne Blake
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
Jennifer McVeigh
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kristin Monge
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Suzanne Mubarak
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Ann Curtin
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Kelly Hollingsworth
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Tamy Wilson
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Kelley Karnes
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Karen Dail
3W–20L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.