Teams

CTL18/Peterson/CTC

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-05vs CTL18/CLEARY/RKWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth King / Shannon Peterson vs Mary-Marlowe Scott / Ruth Horger7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Janaki Emani
published
3.78
Dawson Thornton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Shannon Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Alex Taber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Barrett Self
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Katherine Way
published
3.49
Joanna Dover
published
3.48
Christy Davis
published 4
3.42
Neal Olsgaard
published
3.33
Elizabeth Olsgaard
published
3.30
William Draffin
published
3.21
Lee Elliott
published
3.19
Jordan Hicks
published
3.13
Juanita Cooney
published
Harrison Lanham
published
William Echols
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neal Olsgaard + Elizabeth Olsgaard7356% games−9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janaki Emani
56W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Dawson Thornton
101W–24L career · 1 line in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Shannon Peterson
147W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Alex Taber
71W–17L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.56
4
Barrett Self
47W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
Katherine Way
56W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%49%51%
3.50
Joanna Dover
34W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Christy Davis
45W–18L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Neal Olsgaard
48W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
3.42
Elizabeth Olsgaard
57W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
William Draffin
33W–32L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Lee Elliott
77W–31L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Jordan Hicks
33W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Juanita Cooney
89W–38L career · no lines in 2023
<1%18%82%
3.13
Harrison Lanham
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Echols
20W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.