Teams

1-LBolger-Eno

2023 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening

10 players · average NTRP 3.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-25vs 2-ELinnander-SVCSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRosa Lopez Sanchez / Spenser Radtke vs Sallie Nowacek / Erika Linnander6-1, 7-5
L#1 SinglesSarah Motsinger vs Suyeon Kim6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJessica Sherman / Tiffany Hilton vs Tiffany Langino / Eve Hammett2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Anne Stephens6-3, 6-1
2023-04-20vs 3-MPaul-RQWon 40
W#1 DoublesRosa Lopez Sanchez / Rochelle Grieco vs Elizabeth Harvie / Sophie Plott6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Sneha Mahesh6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSpenser Radtke / Lacey Chylack vs Nathalie Lezcano / Laurie Straube6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristen Fuller / Amber Cagle vs Donna Holtaway / Karen Scherr6-2, 6-5
2023-04-18vs 4-SZIKSAI-SHANE-ElmiraLost 13
W#1 DoublesSarah Motsinger / Tiffany Hilton vs Xylena Simone Sziksai / Christina Aldereguia6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Button Hall4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKimber Barnett / Amber Cagle vs Lynise Devance / Miho Ogura4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Sherman / Anna Koltchagova vs Sierra Mullen / Erin McAllister4-6, 2-6
2023-04-13vs 5-JRoss-EnoLost 14
L#1 DoublesLauren Bolger / Kristen Fuller vs Justyne Ross / Liza Sisler3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Valerie Acre3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Sherman / Anna Koltchagova vs Carrie Guthrie / Beth O'Donnell3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Jamie Harford2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRosa Lopez Sanchez / Spenser Radtke vs Lisa Buyaki / Hannah Silverstein0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-03-30vs 2-ELinnander-SVCWon 32
L#1 DoublesSpenser Radtke / Rochelle Grieco vs Eve Hammett / Tiffany Langino1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Anne Stephens6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Motsinger / Tiffany Hilton vs Christine Lee / Melissa Coward4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Suyeon Kim0-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmber Cagle / Lacey Chylack vs Erika Linnander / Sallie Nowacek7-6, 6-4
2023-03-16vs 5-JRoss-EnoLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmber Cagle / Sarah Motsinger vs Carrie Guthrie / Lisa Buyaki3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Justyne Ross3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAnna Koltchagova / Rochelle Grieco vs Liza Sisler / Jill Akiyama3-6, 3-6
2023-03-14vs 4-SZIKSAI-SHANE-ElmiraWon 31
W#1 SinglesSusie Post-Rust vs Sindhu Shivaji6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Bolger / Kristen Fuller vs Christina Aldereguia / Kimberly Hilt6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAmber Cagle vs Anna Brown6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRochelle Grieco / Jessica Sherman vs Xylena Simone Sziksai / Button Hall2-6, 2-6
2023-03-02vs 3-MPaul-RQWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Bolger / Rosa Lopez Sanchez vs Madison Paul / Janelle Howard6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Motsinger / Jessica Sherman vs Elizabeth Harvie / Laurie Straube6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesChanel Chambers vs Sneha Mahesh6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Women-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Chanel Chambers
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.90
Sarah Motsinger
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Spenser Radtke
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Lauren Bolger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Jessica Sherman
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
3.69
Amber Cagle
usually #2 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.65
Susie Post-Rust
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.49
Tatiana Nevmyrych
published
3.45
Anna Koltchagova
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.41
Rochelle Grieco
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rochelle Grieco + Anna Koltchagova7847% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Bolger + Spenser Radtke5651% gamesnot enough data
Lauren Bolger + Jessica Sherman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chanel Chambers
202W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Sarah Motsinger
38W–22L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Spenser Radtke
105W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Lauren Bolger
94W–76L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Sherman
27W–52L career · 9 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amber Cagle
214W–100L career · 12 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
4
Susie Post-Rust
81W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Tatiana Nevmyrych
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
Anna Koltchagova
182W–161L career · 3 lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Rochelle Grieco
226W–186L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
3.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.