Teams

CTL18/Coward/CTC

Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo Men - 5.5

12 players · average NTRP 2.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-08-13vs CTL18/Alexander/SVCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Coward / Damon Remley vs Chris Zecopoulos / Eric Posenecker7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesScott Prince / Grant Jarratt vs Ronnie Neuberg / Hamilton Howard2-1
2026-08-12vs CTL18/Alexander/SVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJohn Coward / Stuart Peterson vs Hamilton Howard / Ronnie Neuberg6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesScott Prince / Grant Jarratt vs Eric Posenecker / Chris Zecopoulos6-4, 6-3
2026-08-03vs CTL18/Alexander/SVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesHarrison Lanham / Cody Lattimore vs Yu Cheung / William Wolfe6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Dozier / Grant Jarratt vs Chris Zecopoulos / Eric Posenecker6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDamon Remley / Travis Mitchell vs Jeffrey Waris / Ronnie Neuberg6-0, 7-5
2026-07-23vs CTL18/Alexander/SVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesCody Lattimore / Harrison Lanham vs Eric Posenecker / Ronnie Neuberg6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Coward / John David Scheper vs Grayson Williams / Zach Strohecker6-1, 6-0
2026-07-16vs CTL18/Alexander/SVCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobert Dozier / Grant Jarratt vs Yu Cheung / Zach Strohecker6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCody Lattimore / Harrison Lanham vs Chris Zecopoulos / Eric Posenecker6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Coward / George Kreese vs Ronnie Neuberg / Jeffrey Waris6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Combo Men - 5.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL18/Coward/CTC3090029
2CTL18/Alexander/SVCC030918110

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Harrison Lanham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.23
Robert Dozier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
George Kreese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
DWIGHT SAWYER
published 3
2.98
John David Scheper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Damon Remley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Stuart Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Scott Prince
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Grant Jarratt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.49
Cody Lattimore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
John Coward
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Travis Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

DWIGHT SAWYER + John David Scheper314 matchesnot enough data
Damon Remley + Robert Dozier213 matchesnot enough data
Damon Remley + Scott Prince123 matchesnot enough data
Harrison Lanham + Cody Lattimore303 matchesnot enough data
John David Scheper + John Coward123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Harrison Lanham
12W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.29
Robert Dozier
73W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.23
3
George Kreese
35W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.19
3
DWIGHT SAWYER
62W–35L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
John David Scheper
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Damon Remley
33W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
2.96
Stuart Peterson
16W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.93
Scott Prince
26W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
2.5
Grant Jarratt
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%9%91%
2.68
2.5
Cody Lattimore
6W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
John Coward
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Travis Mitchell
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.