Teams

V - Spanish Hills Donas

2022 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.5 WE

7 players · average NTRP 4.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-20vs V - Sunset Net FlicksSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBonnie Luke / Renee Whitlock vs Michelle Harlow / Hanneli Schuster7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Caramelli / Lynn Severn vs Monica Bandy / Janet Klebesadel3-6, 4-6
2022-03-12vs V - Libbey ParkLost 02
L#1 DoublesBonnie Luke / Renee Whitlock vs Huyen Burton / Alexis Davis4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLynn Severn / Kathryn Fiscalini vs Jennifer Lawler / Ghazala Trotter4-6, 3-6
2022-03-06vs V - Libbey ParkSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLynn Severn vs Vanessa Zajfen1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRenee Whitlock / Bonnie Luke vs Debra Blackwell-Schrag / Jennifer Lawler6-1, 6-3
2022-02-20vs V - Sunset Net FlicksSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanet Wallace / Renee Whitlock vs Janet Klebesadel / Grace Perez1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLynn Severn / Erika Tidd vs Monica Bandy / Hanneli Schuster6-3, 7-5
2022-02-13vs V - Libbey ParkSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRenee Whitlock / Bonnie Luke vs Alexis Davis / Huyen Burton4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Wallace / Lynn Severn vs Sarah Owings / TRACY GUILLEN7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2022-01-09vs V - Sunset Net FlicksWon 20
W#2 DoublesBonnie Luke / Janet Wallace vs Mia de Leon / Grace Perez6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn Severn / Erika Tidd vs Tracey Ackourey / Deanna Romero6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.5 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Janet Wallace
published
4.10
Renee Whitlock
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Nancy Caramelli
published
3.92
Bonnie Luke
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.92
Lynn Severn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Erika Tidd
published 4
Christy Foreman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bonnie Luke + Renee Whitlock8948% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Severn + Renee Whitlock11138% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Severn + Bonnie Luke2353% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Wallace
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Renee Whitlock
107W–138L career · 5 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.10
Nancy Caramelli
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Bonnie Luke
62W–62L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Lynn Severn
77W–145L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Erika Tidd
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Christy Foreman
27W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.