Teams

IND:YellowFuzzyBalls:Gerhard:Tall

2022 NH Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-05-01vs EXE:Maye:McGuireLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdam Gerhard / Sandra Reiniger vs Michael Rubin / Christine Tatro4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLiz Govoni / Eugene Zakharov vs Timothy Hannan / Lindsey Maye5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLawrence Raimondi / Mary Siverts vs Alan Becker / Ann Dahlen6-2, 6-1
2022-03-27vs EXE:Maye:McGuireLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Henry / Jeremy Dear vs Kerry Omeara / Michael Rubin4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Reiniger / Adam Gerhard vs Melissa Lawless / Bert Cunningham7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPatricia Lovejoy / Eugene Zakharov vs Lindsey Maye / Kyle Maye3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jeremy Dear
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Sandra Reiniger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Eugene Zakharov
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Liz Govoni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Adam Gerhard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Mary Siverts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Kathleen Henry
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Patricia Lovejoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Anne Tall
published 3
Lawrence Raimondi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Gerhard + Sandra Reiniger10557% games+1.1% vs expected
Anne Tall + Adam Gerhard8749% gamesnot enough data
Adam Gerhard + Mary Siverts134 matchesnot enough data
Liz Govoni + Eugene Zakharov213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Dear
54W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
Sandra Reiniger
57W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Eugene Zakharov
39W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Liz Govoni
56W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Adam Gerhard
104W–114L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
Mary Siverts
41W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Kathleen Henry
37W–62L career · 1 line in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Patricia Lovejoy
61W–103L career · 1 line in 2022
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Anne Tall
92W–84L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
2.65
Lawrence Raimondi
3W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.