Teams

Pearce/Murfreesboro

2025 Combo 55 & Over-Monday- Murfreesboro · 7.5 Combo 55 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-15vs Wishing/MurfreesboroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeanna Wright / Suzanne Eubank vs Brenda Monajjem / Shannon Fox3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMidori Egawa / Tricia Davis vs Sally Wrather / Ronda Hawkins3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-09vs Blankenship/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Shipp / Leanna Wright vs Pamela Hicks / Julie LaLance3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMolly Adcock / Holly Massengill vs Patricia Frawley / Ann Manning7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Barbara Kendall vs Angela Blankenship / Clair Cochran5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-25vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Massengill / Vicki Jacobs vs Jennifer Kelley / Wendy Rogers6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Barbara Long vs Brenda Monajjem / Ronda Hawkins4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMidori Egawa / Connie Pearce vs Jeanine Dyer / Shannon Fox3-6, 1-6
2025-08-18vs Blankenship/MurfreesboroWon 21
L#1 DoublesConnie Pearce / Jan Phanthalangsy vs Angela Blankenship / Tammy Shrivalle6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTricia Davis / Midori Egawa vs Julie LaLance / Patricia Frawley6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMolly Adcock / Shannon Johnson Waxman vs Jane Barnes-Tilford / Ann Manning7-5, 7-5
2025-08-04vs Wishing/MurfreesboroWon 30
W#1 DoublesMidori Egawa / Tricia Davis vs Jeanine Dyer / Ronda Hawkins7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJan Phanthalangsy / Barbara Kendall vs Joy Owens / Joan Arney6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVicki Jacobs / Holly Massengill vs Liz Daney / Sally Wrather7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Suzanne Eubank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Midori Egawa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.56
Jan Phanthalangsy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Barbara Long
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.50
Holly Massengill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Melanie Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Tricia Davis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Barbara Kendall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Molly Adcock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Connie Pearce
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Leanna Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Johnson Waxman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Midori Egawa + Tricia Davis4154% gamesnot enough data
Melanie Shipp + Suzanne Eubank0526% gamesnot enough data
Connie Pearce + Molly Adcock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Eubank
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Midori Egawa
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
Jan Phanthalangsy
24W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Barbara Long
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Holly Massengill
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.50
Melanie Shipp
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.43
Tricia Davis
19W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Kendall
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.25
Molly Adcock
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Connie Pearce
11W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
Leanna Wright
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Shannon Johnson Waxman
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.