Teams

TeamForman (Riviera Prep)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Day · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.42 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-01-31vs TeamForman2 (Riviera Prep)Split 11
W#2 DoublesMellissa Cili / Gina Marinelli vs Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco / Lorena Guadiana6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesYuliet Pellegrini / ANGELA MUSSO vs Judy Prado / Tiffany Ortiz2-6, 2-6
2022-01-24vs TeamForman2 (Riviera Prep)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKelly James / Mellissa Cili vs Judy Prado / Tiffany Ortiz3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesYuliet Pellegrini / ANGELA MUSSO vs Gillian McKenzie / Patricia Bowler6-4, 7-5
2022-01-17vs TeamForman2 (Riviera Prep)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly James / Mellissa Cili vs Tiffany Ortiz / Gillian McKenzie6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Mellissa Cili
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Mildred Rembisz
published
3.38
Kelly James
published
3.36
Luisa Angel
published
3.32
Yuliet Pellegrini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
XIMENA OTERO
published
3.16
Ana Veloso
published 3.5
3.10
Gina Marinelli
published 3.5
3.09
Paola Campanella
published
3.04
ANGELA MUSSO
published 3.5
2.79
Andrea Knutson
published 3
Jane Forman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mellissa Cili + Yuliet Pellegrini7357% gamesnot enough data
Paola Campanella + Luisa Angel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Mellissa Cili
229W–184L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
Mildred Rembisz
118W–53L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
3.48
Kelly James
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
Luisa Angel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Yuliet Pellegrini
206W–125L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
XIMENA OTERO
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Ana Veloso
54W–94L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gina Marinelli
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
Paola Campanella
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
ANGELA MUSSO
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Andrea Knutson
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.