Teams

MCP.Delbridge

2026 CTRL Summer Singles 18 & Over · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-08-26vs TOC.MurdockLost 02
L#1 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Sapna Varkey0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesZoe Delbridge vs Liz Chen1-6, 0-6
2026-08-16vs TOC.ArmstrongLost 12
W#1 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Katie Baker7-5, 6-0
L#2 SinglesJessica Mclanahan vs Michaela Brannock0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesZoe Delbridge vs Cary Armstrong0-6, 0-6
2026-08-13vs TOC.MurdockLost 12
L#1 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Lindsay Murdock5-7, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDivya Iyengar vs Kristen Boyce2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesJessica Mclanahan vs Anna Kooper0-6, 0-6
2026-08-12vs TOC.RiderWon 21
L#1 SinglesJessica Mclanahan vs Mary Emma Holscher1-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDivya Iyengar vs Molly Andrews6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Meghan Rider6-4, 7-5
2026-07-22vs TOC.RiderLost 12
W#1 SinglesDivya Iyengar vs Carrie Guthrie6-0, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Molly Andrews3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesZoe Delbridge vs Rebekah Schloemann1-6, 0-6
2026-07-15vs TOC.ArmstrongWon 20
W#1 SinglesDivya Iyengar vs Molly Tschang6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Cary Armstrong6-1, 6-1
2026-06-30vs TOC.MurdockLost 02
L#1 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Kristen Boyce2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJessica Mclanahan vs Hilary Tew0-6, 0-6
2026-06-10vs TOC.RiderLost 12
L#1 SinglesDivya Iyengar vs Molly Andrews3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Rebekah Schloemann7-5, 6-2
L#3 SinglesZoe Delbridge vs Hannah Boghosian0-6, 0-6
2026-06-03vs TOC.ArmstrongLost 03
L#1 SinglesJade Annaldo vs Megan Bradley2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesZoe Delbridge vs Molly Tschang0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJessica Mclanahan vs Jennifer Kuzma0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer Singles 18 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TOC.Murdock712137109
2MCP.Delbridge2691532229

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Divya Iyengar
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 4
3.78
Jade Annaldo
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.29
Zoe Delbridge
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.22
Jessica Mclanahan
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Divya Iyengar
4W–1L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Jade Annaldo
11W–7L career · type S · 9 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
Zoe Delbridge
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
3.29
Jessica Mclanahan
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.