Teams

Mitchell TOCC

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Men 3.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-22vs OSTC - FriersonWon 20
W#1 SinglesLee Gabardi vs Rick Liebig6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBrendon Confer vs James Lang6-1, 6-1
2024-11-26vs BBTC - WardLost 02
L#1 SinglesBrendon Confer vs Seth Hester2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLee Gabardi vs Jeffrey Ward4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-11-21vs BBTC - WardLost 02
L#2 SinglesBrendon Confer vs Jeffrey Ward3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDamon Westfaul vs Robert Barnes Lll1-6, 6-7
2024-11-19vs OSTC - FriersonSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLee Gabardi vs John OKeefe6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJay Osman vs James Lang2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-11-05vs OSTC - FriersonWon 20
W#1 SinglesBrendon Confer vs Terral Callegari6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesRichard Mattiace vs Mateo Escaner6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC - Ward3193885
2Mitchell TOCC339918123
3OSTC - Frierson133919122

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Brendon Confer
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Damon Westfaul
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Lee Gabardi
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
2.99
Richard Mattiace
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.83
Jay Osman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.78
Brice Mitchell
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
David Spencer
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brendon Confer + Richard Mattiace1446% gamesnot enough data
Brice Mitchell + Damon Westfaul224 matchesnot enough data
Jay Osman + Damon Westfaul033 matchesnot enough data
Brendon Confer + Lee Gabardi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brendon Confer
27W–27L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Damon Westfaul
37W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Lee Gabardi
42W–28L career · 8 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.07
Richard Mattiace
11W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
Jay Osman
31W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Brice Mitchell
54W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
David Spencer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.