Teams

Thompson

2024 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2024-05-20vs Politi/Harrison 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrook Kelley / Krystal Glasgow vs Whitney Harrison / Jackie Cruse6-4, 6-3
2024-05-15vs Tatum 18& upWon 10
W#1 DoublesKrystal Glasgow / Brook Kelley vs Julianne Assad / Sarah Reamer6-2, 6-0
2024-05-08vs Atterbury 18Won 10
W#2 DoublesMiriam Thompson / Krystal Glasgow vs Lisa Gilbert / Melissa Rahe6-4, 7-5
2024-05-04vs Greene-Brinkley 18Won 10
W#1 SinglesKrystal Glasgow vs Candy Garrett6-2, 6-2
2024-04-24vs Glancy 18 Spring 24Lost 01
L#2 SinglesKrystal Glasgow vs Kristin Main1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-20vs Parker/KnappLost 01
L#1 DoublesKrystal Glasgow / Elise Rouse vs Lindsay Parker / Ashley Doyle1-6, 1-6
2024-04-15vs Politi/Harrison 4.0 18+Won 10
W#1 SinglesKrystal Glasgow vs Chikako Sugawara2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-04-13vs Tatum 18& upWon 10
W#1 SinglesKrystal Glasgow vs Julianne Assad6-3, 6-2
2024-04-10vs Atterbury 18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrook Kelley / Krystal Glasgow vs Lisa Gilbert / Lisa Phelps3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-30vs Greene-Brinkley 18Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrook Kelley / Krystal Glasgow vs Lynn Gore / Candy Garrett6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-26vs Glancy 18 Spring 24Won 10
W#1 SinglesKrystal Glasgow vs Jean Sabina Vidrascu6-3, 6-0
2024-03-16vs WILSON 4.0 (18)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKrystal Glasgow vs Adrienne Beatty0-6, 6-7
2024-03-06vs Parker/KnappLost 01
L#1 SinglesKrystal Glasgow vs Lindsay Parker6-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Krystal Glasgow
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4.5
3.79
Miriam Thompson
published
3.77
Franca Buffalino
published 4
3.73
Janet Waren
published
3.64
Elise Rouse
published 3.5
3.56
Hope Conway
published 4
3.50
Anna Taylor
published 4
3.31
Jenna Butler
published
Louise Sloan
published
Thornton Cornette
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Taylor + Elise Rouse6161% games+24.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Krystal Glasgow
77W–22L career · 13 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
4.21
Miriam Thompson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Franca Buffalino
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Janet Waren
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Elise Rouse
14W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.64
4
Hope Conway
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Anna Taylor
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.50
Jenna Butler
18W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.31
Louise Sloan
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thornton Cornette
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.