Teams

UPTA40C/Malort/Riverside

2026 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40+ Combo Men - 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 13 1:00 PM
Riverside Tennis Club
Sep 20 1:00 PM
Greenville Tennis Club
2026-08-30vs UPTA40C/Smith/GCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoshua Baisden / John Warden vs Matthew Vogt / Matthew Smith6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJose Javier Solis Lopez / Mark Lane vs Taylor Gribbin / Jay Whitney5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Spotts / Nikhil Bhat vs Thomas Cheves / Matt Marron6-2, 7-6
2026-08-23vs UPTA40C/Markham/BrookstoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Lane / Shinsuke Kashikura vs Kyle Langill / Lloyd Orr6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesThomas Nelson / Myint Khaing vs Boyce Markham / Mark Curin3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNikhil Bhat / John Spotts vs Patrick Rosopa / David Keen6-1, 6-4
2026-08-09vs UPTA40C/Edwards/CardinalLost 12
L#1 DoublesJose Javier Solis Lopez / Jody Smoak vs Frank Vandiver / Dave Federspiel3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNikhil Bhat / Perry Henderson vs David Foster / Calhoun Mays7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJohn Spotts / Stanley Henson vs Clark Anderson / Jon Holmes7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2026-08-02vs UPTA40C/Kiss/Neely FarmWon 21
L#1 DoublesAashish Amin / Nikhil Bhat vs Scott Juvelier / Jeff Greenstreet6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPerry Henderson / Mark Lane vs David Allen / Scott Blackwell6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Spotts / Stanley Henson vs Henry Oleary / Csaba Kiss6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 40+ Combo Men - 7.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA40C/Kianos/GTC3081782
2UPTA40C/Edwards/Cardinal2051445
3UPTA40C/Meredith/ACAC2163878
4UPTA40C/Malort/Riverside1133645
5UPTA40C/Smith/GCC12271594
6UPTA40C/Kiss/Neely Farm134819132
7UPTA40C/Markham/Brookstone03271486

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Shinsuke Kashikura
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
John Warden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
John Spotts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Garett Matheis
published 4
3.69
Jose Javier Solis Lopez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Aashish Amin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Paul Wagenknecht
published
3.63
Philip Ross
published
3.60
Chris Corbin
published 3.5
3.53
Nikhil Bhat
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Joshua Baisden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Myint Khaing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Stanley Henson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Perry Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
3.19
Jody Smoak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Thomas Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Garett Matheis + John Spotts134 matchesnot enough data
Stanley Henson + Joshua Baisden123 matchesnot enough data
John Warden + Jose Javier Solis Lopez213 matchesnot enough data
Philip Ross + Thomas Nelson213 matchesnot enough data
Nikhil Bhat + John Spotts303 matchesnot enough data
Nikhil Bhat + Krishnaraj Sambandhan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shinsuke Kashikura
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%38%62%
4.04
John Warden
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
John Spotts
27W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Garett Matheis
9W–15L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Jose Javier Solis Lopez
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Aashish Amin
4W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Paul Wagenknecht
10W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.67
Philip Ross
8W–10L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Chris Corbin
5W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.60
Nikhil Bhat
23W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
Joshua Baisden
9W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Myint Khaing
29W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Stanley Henson
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.45
Perry Henderson
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
3.43
Krishnaraj Sambandhan
9W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Jody Smoak
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
Thomas Nelson
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.