Teams

PENINSULA GCC CW6.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 6.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Danielle Bromberg
published 3.5
3.26
Jen Keane
published
3.16
Paige Cattano
published
3.12
Kirsten Clarke
published
3.11
Abra Stein
published 3
3.10
Sara Weaver
published
3.06
Rima Khalil
published
3.03
Isa Kravitz
published 3.5
2.99
Margaret Crawford
published
2.89
Beth Rogers
published 3
2.87
Beatrice Murphy
published 3
2.86
Vicky Prezeau
published
2.83
Stephanie Chu
published
2.82
Heidi Krakovsky
published 3.5
2.80
Amy Mchugh
published 3
2.77
Amy Figueroa
published 3
2.76
Yvonne Roth
published
Cathy Benko
published 3
Claire Mariani
published 3
Denise Schaul
published 3
2.74
JJ Elliott
published 3
2.72
Christina Pietro
published 3
2.65
Jasmine Bhuva
published
2.37
Tina Tan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beatrice Murphy + Beth Rogers6161% gamesnot enough data
Amy Mchugh + Christina Pietro224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Chu + Vicky Prezeau134 matchesnot enough data
Beatrice Murphy + Vicky Prezeau044 matchesnot enough data
Beth Rogers + Vicky Prezeau213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danielle Bromberg
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Jen Keane
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Paige Cattano
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.16
Kirsten Clarke
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Abra Stein
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.11
Sara Weaver
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.10
Rima Khalil
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Isa Kravitz
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Margaret Crawford
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Beth Rogers
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Beatrice Murphy
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.87
Vicky Prezeau
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
2.86
Stephanie Chu
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.83
3.5
Heidi Krakovsky
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.82
3
Amy Mchugh
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amy Figueroa
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Yvonne Roth
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Cathy Benko
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Claire Mariani
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Denise Schaul
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
JJ Elliott
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Christina Pietro
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Jasmine Bhuva
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Tina Tan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.