Teams

18 TCRC Wade

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-21vs 23 Avalon ArmstrongWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Edmondson vs Faith Kallman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-15vs 19 Burkwood ClarkWon 10
W#2 SinglesAmanda Edmondson vs April Buckles6-1, 6-2
2022-04-30vs 6 ACAC StephensSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKatherine Mortimer / Marineth Kight vs Donna Barrett / Dawn MacHonis4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Felicia Schooley vs Hilary Brodsky / Susan Hefty6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-04-16vs 13 Burkwood FarmerWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Wade / Amanda Edmondson vs Susan Fisher / Ellen Bedichek5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-09vs 11 WOCC HaasLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarineth Kight / Jeannie Wyant vs Betsy Kersey / Susan Mangin5-7, 3-6
2022-04-02vs 9 MAC GreenspoonLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmanda Edmondson / Melissa Skorupa vs Susan Staton / Bernice White4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Karen Devalk
published
3.16
Donna Wade
published 3.5
3.15
Donna Hall
published 3.5
3.13
Beth Parrish
published 3.5
3.12
Melissa Skorupa
published
3.11
Felicia Schooley
published 3.5
3.05
Marineth Kight
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.05
Lisa Loudermilk
published
3.04
Virginia Grigg
published
2.98
Jeannie Wyant
published
2.95
Angie Pearson
published 3.5
2.92
Katherine Mortimer
published
2.83
Amanda Edmondson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Grigg + Katherine Mortimer123 matchesnot enough data
Donna Hall + Katherine Mortimer033 matchesnot enough data
Katherine Mortimer + Melissa Skorupa033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Devalk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Donna Wade
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Donna Hall
13W–21L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Beth Parrish
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Melissa Skorupa
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Felicia Schooley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Marineth Kight
118W–61L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
Lisa Loudermilk
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
Virginia Grigg
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
Jeannie Wyant
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Angie Pearson
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Katherine Mortimer
7W–21L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Amanda Edmondson
27W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.