Teams

BBTC Storey

2025 Adult 55 & Over-GC · Women 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-14vs TOCC - Gordin/LanglinaisWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Mayfield / Audry Bush vs Beth Gordin / Sue Battaile6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Saunier / Leslie Dane vs Shari Pol / Mary Sukiennik6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGwen Urbati / Leslie Collins vs Jeanell Weems / Penny Westfaul7-6, 6-1
2025-04-09vs DH-Hardie2025Won 21
L#1 DoublesPhyllis Shoemake / Leslie Dane vs Stephanie Hardie / Lori Dewitt3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCathy Saunier / Audry Bush vs Robin Mitterer / Geralyn Roberts6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeslie Collins / Gwen Urbati vs Traci Frizzell / Kristin Beddoe6-1, 1-6, 1-0
2025-04-01vs TOCC - Gordin/LanglinaisWon 30
W#1 DoublesGwen Urbati / Linda Benigno vs Odile Million / Elizabeth Mc MacKin6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCathy Saunier / Leslie Collins vs Darlene Nichols / Charlene Langlinais6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRebecca Mayfield / Audry Bush vs Sue Battaile / Shari Pol6-0, 6-2
2025-03-23vs DH-Hardie2025Won 30
W#1 DoublesDena Karr / Linda Benigno vs Traci Frizzell / Lori Dewitt6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGwen Urbati / Kathryn Plott vs Stephanie Hardie / Kristin Beddoe6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargaret McCrary / Leslie Dane vs Virginia Boyle / Robin Mitterer6-0, 6-3
2025-03-20vs BBTC - Mayer/ResterWon 30
W#1 DoublesDena Karr / Rebecca Mayfield vs Allene Balgord / Sam Allen6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLeslie Collins / Sandra Boddie vs Amy Knight / Betsy Taylor6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Storey / Leslie Dane vs Laurie Baughman / Cindy Creel6-1, 6-2
2025-03-13vs SRYC Thompson-ChristensenWon 20
W#1 DoublesGwen Urbati / Kathryn Plott vs Gwen Thompson / Susan McCormick6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCathy Saunier / Audry Bush vs Tracy Porter / Lauri-Ellen Smith6-1, 6-1
2025-03-03vs SRYC Thompson-ChristensenWon 30
W#1 DoublesPhyllis Shoemake / Sandra Boddie vs Gwen Thompson / Suzanne Mestayer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Mayfield / Audry Bush vs Charlotte Gattis / Yvette Weeks6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLeslie Dane / Nancy Storey vs Lauri-Ellen Smith / Patti Christensen6-4, 7-5
2025-02-27vs BBTC - Mayer/ResterWon 30
W#1 DoublesGwen Urbati / Dena Karr vs Allene Balgord / Jennifer MacE6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret McCrary / Kathryn Plott vs Amy Knight / Kathleen Mayer6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Collins / Linda Benigno vs Lee Ann Hunter / Betsy Taylor6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC Storey802225102
2TOCC - Gordin/Langlinais6216820207
3DH-Hardie202544141022199
4BBTC - Mayer/Rester2651940262
5SRYC Thompson-Christensen0832144278

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Phyllis Shoemake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Cathy Saunier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Dena Karr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Gwen Urbati
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.15
Audry Bush
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Linda Benigno
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Sandra Boddie
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.09
Rebecca Mayfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Kathryn Plott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Leslie Dane
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Margaret McCrary
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Storey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dena Karr + Gwen Urbati10065% games+18.7% vs expected
Audry Bush + Rebecca Mayfield5654% games+7.0% vs expected
Audry Bush + Linda Benigno303 matchesnot enough data
Audry Bush + Cathy Saunier213 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Saunier + Rebecca Mayfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Phyllis Shoemake
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.44
4
Cathy Saunier
27W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Dena Karr
45W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Gwen Urbati
54W–26L career · 7 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Audry Bush
33W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Linda Benigno
42W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Sandra Boddie
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Rebecca Mayfield
42W–33L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kathryn Plott
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Dane
5W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret McCrary
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Storey
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.