Teams

Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen

2023 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.0W

17 players · average NTRP 3.78 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-12-14vs Sports Mall-AffleckSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesTeri Bishop / Melanie Hall vs Lindie Hoggan / Amanda Lewis6-3, 5-4
L#2 Female DoublesKatrina Harlan / DeeAnn Edwards vs JaNae Smith / Jennifer Rasmussen3-6, 3-5
2023-12-07vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksSplit 11
W#2 Female DoublesKatrina Harlan / Melanie Hall vs Megan Rusconi / Cathy Mclevish6-1, 6-2
L#3 Female DoublesKelly Mortensen / DeeAnn Edwards vs Jill Brown / Sherree Greenhalgh2-6, 6-7
2023-11-30vs Sunpro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 02
L#2 Female DoublesKatrina Harlan / DeeAnn Edwards vs Brenda Fowler / Sherilyn Rawlings2-6, 5-2, 0-1
L#3 Female DoublesTeri Bishop / Susan Christensen vs Halli Craft / Kimberly Mayfield3-6, 3-5
2023-11-16vs RISE AC-GlinesLost 01
L#2 Female DoublesTeri Bishop / Andy Torres vs Sarah Love / Kristi Warren2-6, 4-6
2023-11-09vs Ivory Ridge-Holland/JarvieLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesKatrina Harlan / Kelly Mortensen vs Trista Willardson / Jamie Price4-6, 5-3, 0-1
2023-11-02vs Sports Mall-AffleckLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesNan Black / DeeAnn Edwards vs Crystel Fox / Cristie Briggs2-6, 5-4, 0-1
L#1 Female SinglesTeri Bishop vs Elizabeth Thomas4-6, 0-3
L#3 Female DoublesAmy Rees / Katrina Harlan vs Stacie Johnson / Jennifer Rasmussen4-6, 1-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RISE AC-Glines6017719179
2Liberty Park Tennis-Young/Swensen5117718188
3Wasatch Rec Center-Berg/Hronek5117720167
4Cottonwood Club-Briesacher/Gardner4218616161
5Sports Mall-Affleck42141025199
6Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry3315924186
7Sunpro-Warren/Carter33101431196
8Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/Brooks24101433225
9Ivory Ridge-Holland/Jarvie24101433227
10Sunpro-Leishman/Mortensen1561837227
11Salt Lake Tennis-Rasmussen1551939252
12Liberty Park-Jones/Moreton0651941246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Staci Leishman
published 4
Amy Rees
published 4
Andy Torres
published 4
3.65
Teri Bishop
usually #1 Female Singles 25%, also #2 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Melanie Hall
published
3.57
Suzanne Burdge
published
3.43
DeeAnn Edwards
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Nan Black
published
3.35
Katrina Harlan
usually #2 Female Doubles 60%, also #3 Female Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Jennifer Stringham
usually #1 Female Singles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Carolyn Andrus
published 3.5
3.27
Tamara Miller
published
3.22
Raquel Westover
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Kristi Parker
published
3.18
Kelly Mortensen
published
Jennifer Granum
published
Susan Christensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Hall + Teri Bishop3260% games+14.2% vs expected
Tamara Miller + Suzanne Burdge4348% games+7.8% vs expected
Tamara Miller + Jennifer Stringham6360% games+7.0% vs expected
Carolyn Andrus + Tamara Miller4256% games+3.5% vs expected
Suzanne Burdge + Melanie Hall161255% games+2.7% vs expected
DeeAnn Edwards + Katrina Harlan71442% games+2.3% vs expected
Amy Rees + Staci Leishman41243% games+1.5% vs expected
Jennifer Stringham + Kristi Parker523653% games+1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Staci Leishman
87W–67L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Amy Rees
26W–46L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Andy Torres
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Teri Bishop
181W–151L career · 4 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Melanie Hall
61W–53L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.62
Suzanne Burdge
93W–83L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
DeeAnn Edwards
117W–143L career · 4 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Nan Black
48W–82L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Katrina Harlan
127W–128L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Jennifer Stringham
124W–120L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Carolyn Andrus
61W–69L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Tamara Miller
94W–80L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Raquel Westover
113W–129L career · 6 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Kristi Parker
97W–114L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Kelly Mortensen
110W–103L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jennifer Granum
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Christensen
32W–61L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.