Teams

Val’s Team - OSTC

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over-GC · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 14 6:00 PM
Bayou Bluff Tennis Club
Sep 21 7:00 PM
Ocean Springs City Tennis Center
Sep 30 7:30 PM
vs
Treasure Oak Country Club
2026-08-31vs Fitzgerald - BBTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesValeria Rojas / Ashley Smith vs Lauren Patin / Taylor Leatherwood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTeresa Parrish / Anna Myers vs DeAnn Fontenot / Angie Cagle0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Rumsey / Angela Vo vs Emily Newman Waddell / Tracy Head4-6, 2-6
2026-08-10vs BBTC - DenmarkWon 21
L#1 DoublesGerry MacKay / Trista Nash vs Sam Allen / Kathleen Mayer2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesValeria Rojas / Angela Vo vs Amy Knight / Tina Pridgen4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Cook / Janis Clark vs Jessica Hightower / Melissa Steenkamp7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2026-08-04vs BBTC-MATTHEWS 6.5 WOMENLost 12
L#1 DoublesAngela Vo / Anna Myers vs Stacey Rishel / LeAnn Davis3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Cook / Janis Clark vs Barbara Duvall / Chaille Munn0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Rumsey / Crystal Harper vs Pam Berdine / Michele Gargiulo6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTC-MATTHEWS 6.5 WOMEN1021322
2Val’s Team - OSTC1133859
3BBTC-Creel000000
4Fitzgerald - BBTC000000
5BBTC - Denmark0112428

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Crystal Harper
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.97
Gerry MacKay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Anna Myers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.69
Trista Nash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Melissa Rumsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Angela Vo
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Teresa Parrish
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Lynn Hebert
published
Janis Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lindsey Bourgeois
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Valeria Rojas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Crystal Harper
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Gerry MacKay
22W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.97
3.5
Anna Myers
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
Trista Nash
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Melissa Rumsey
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Angela Vo
20W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Teresa Parrish
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
Lynn Hebert
12W–14L career · no lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
Janis Clark
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lindsey Bourgeois
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Valeria Rojas
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.