Teams

Da.Boone18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-02vs Ka.Manooch18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesHaley Wetmore / Megan Wilkinson vs Alicia Gilleskie / Drewry Carter3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Mullen vs Anna Brown4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAmy Holman / Helena Rumsey vs Kara Manooch / Alana Goldstein6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-25vs Co.Hicks18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesJoey Elphick / Amy Holman vs Courtney Hicks / Kaitlyn Floyd0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Wilkinson vs Sydney Beasley0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDanielle Boone / Devany Ayers vs Molly Gorham / Blair Cobb6-7, 2-6
2025-03-21vs Ka.Manooch18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Vickers / Megan Wilkinson vs Arielle Dozier / Anna Brown3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Mullen vs Stephanie Styers6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJessy Ellis / Danielle Boone vs Alana Goldstein / Beth Johnson6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Amanda Mullen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.36
Megan Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.27
Jessy Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.08
Jessica Vickers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Devany Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.02
Claire See
published 2.5
1.95
Danielle Boone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.85
Haley Wetmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.81
Nina Thomas
published
1.62
Joey Elphick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Helena Rumsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Seward
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amanda Mullen
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Megan Wilkinson
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.36
Jessy Ellis
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Jessica Vickers
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Devany Ayers
1W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Claire See
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Danielle Boone
1W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Haley Wetmore
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Nina Thomas
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.81
Joey Elphick
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.62
Helena Rumsey
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Seward
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.