Teams

Robbins

2025 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 9.0 Adult Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-23vs BoylesLost 03
L#1 DoublesRocco Testini / Kasey Heinrich vs Nathanael Boles / Chrystal Nickol Aranda1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHarrison Marsh / Jennifer Moore vs Jack Williams / Whitney Rose Farquhar2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja vs Tucker Haynes / Gracelyn Anderson3-6, 2-6
2025-08-23vs BoylesLost 12
L#1 DoublesRocco Testini / Kasey Heinrich vs Nathanael Boles / Chrystal Nickol Aranda2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja vs Jack Williams / Gracelyn Anderson4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCarson Rodriguez / Jennifer Moore vs Joe Alvarez / Latisha McLaurin3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-23vs BoylesLost 02
L#1 DoublesDain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja vs Nathanael Boles / Latisha McLaurin0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRocco Testini / Kasey Heinrich vs Tucker Haynes / Whitney Rose Farquhar1-6, 2-6
2025-08-22vs BoylesLost 02
L#1 DoublesHarrison Marsh / Jennifer Moore vs Joe Alvarez / Whitney Rose Farquhar2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDain Guetersloh / Eva Ceja vs Tucker Haynes / Chrystal Nickol Aranda1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carson Rodriguez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Harrison Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Eva Ceja
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Kasey Heinrich
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Angela Trevithick
published 3.5
3.61
Dain Guetersloh
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Rocco Testini
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eva Ceja + Dain Guetersloh0525% gamesnot enough data
Kasey Heinrich + Rocco Testini134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carson Rodriguez
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Harrison Marsh
8W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Eva Ceja
6W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kasey Heinrich
15W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Angela Trevithick
41W–34L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.68
4
Dain Guetersloh
9W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.61
Rocco Testini
11W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.