Teams

JoyTennisDivision

2026 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-08vs Bad BounceLost 01
L#1 DoublesTony Balkan / Joe Morrow vs Raghu Havaldar / Steve Yang5-7, 2-6
2026-07-23vs Hotpot-OneDoubles-FengLost 01
L#1 DoublesSavas Parastatidis / Juan Lopez vs Zhe Feng / Ximeng Jia1-6, 0-6
2026-07-14vs Doubles TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Morrow / Christopher Glassmoyer vs Joe van Zyl / Justin Marquart6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-09vs Hit and RunWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlessandro Contenti / Tony Balkan vs Amit Wadhwa / Rajesh Gatti6-3, 6-0
2026-07-02vs No-Strings-AttachedLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlessandro Contenti / Savas Parastatidis vs Vaibhav Bora / Anand Kancherla1-6, 2-6
2026-06-23vs 2026 - PSC Zhang/ZhaoWon 10
W#1 DoublesTony Balkan / Joe Morrow vs David Zhao / Charles Zhang6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-23vs DaciaLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Glassmoyer / Juan Lopez vs Ciprian Clinciu / Chanadejh Sakchalathorn1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Joe Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Alessandro Contenti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Juan Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Tony Balkan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Christopher Glassmoyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Savas Parastatidis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony Balkan + Alessandro Contenti6169% games+16.0% vs expected
Christopher Glassmoyer + Savas Parastatidis3251% games+10.4% vs expected
Savas Parastatidis + Alessandro Contenti2347% games+0.5% vs expected
Tony Balkan + Christopher Glassmoyer123 matchesnot enough data
Tony Balkan + Savas Parastatidis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Joe Morrow
78W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Alessandro Contenti
85W–75L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Juan Lopez
22W–22L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3
Tony Balkan
87W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Christopher Glassmoyer
20W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Savas Parastatidis
58W–100L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.