Teams

Davis/LR/Reb

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring League 3.0,3.5,4.0 · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-20vs Ross/Bryant/LR/RebWon 41
W#1 DoublesStuart Davis / Lacey Watts vs Lanie Driver / Holly Driver6-4, 4-5
W#1 SinglesAnna Catherine Cargile vs Roz Taylor7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Blair Simpson / Yerenia Adame Hernandez vs Abbey Hornbeck / Amy Ross4-6, 2-5
W#2 SinglesBethany Downs vs Traci Bishop Kiernan6-7, 2-0
W#3 DoublesErin Cosse / Jo Margaret Bennett vs Sara Bryant / Sara Koger6-4, 4-2
2025-04-09vs Schillcutt/Jacksonville/BPWon 31
W#1 DoublesLacey Watts / Yerenia Adame Hernandez vs Torie Russell / Megan Hurtt6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesBethany Downs vs Alexandra Pagoni3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKyndra McCrillis / Ashley Blair Simpson vs Ruslana Tytarenko / Jessica Caple6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJo Margaret Bennett / Kharyssa Brown vs Abbey Laureano / Amy Webster6-2, 7-5
2025-04-01vs Harkins/Wilson/LR/RebWon 41
L#1 DoublesShelli Chupik / Cindy Cope vs Kristen Bailey / Julie Jefferson6-4, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLacey Watts vs Caroline Thomas4-6, 5-2
W#2 DoublesHolly Caruthers / Yerenia Adame Hernandez vs Molly Morrison / Elizabeth Chandler7-5, 6-1
W#2 SinglesBethany Downs vs Molly Bradney6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesErin Cosse / Anna Catherine Cargile vs Aaron Nixon / Amy Harkins6-3, 6-1
2025-03-24vs Schillcutt/Jacksonville/BPWon 50
W#1 DoublesKyndra McCrillis / Bethany Downs vs Jessica Turner / Caroline Dominick6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLacey Watts vs Alexandra Pagoni6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKharyssa Brown / Margaret Jackson vs Torie Russell / Christine Massey6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAnna Catherine Cargile vs Amanda Mamula6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYerenia Adame Hernandez / Ashley Blair Simpson vs Abbey Laureano / Amy Webster6-1, 6-0
2025-03-12vs Harkins/Wilson/LR/RebWon 41
W#1 DoublesKyndra McCrillis / Bethany Downs vs Julie Jefferson / Elizabeth Chandler6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLacey Watts vs Caroline Thomas6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStuart Davis / Ashley Blair Simpson vs Aaron Nixon / Amy Harkins6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesYerenia Adame Hernandez vs Molly Bradney6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Jackson / Cindy Cope vs Jillian Wilson / Kate Lachowsky-Khan6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-02-24vs Allison/Buck/LR/OCLost 23
W#1 DoublesStuart Davis / Holly Caruthers vs Melissa Buck / Brenda Green3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesYerenia Adame Hernandez vs Tiffanie Taylor6-4, 5-1
L#2 DoublesKharyssa Brown / Erin Cosse vs Susan Allison / Lisa Moreland5-7, 4-4
L#2 SinglesAshley Blair Simpson vs Laura Feng3-6, 0-5
L#3 DoublesMargaret Jackson / Bethany Downs vs Debra Wayne / Leslie Warford6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Lacey Watts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.17
Holly Caruthers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Yerenia Adame Hernandez
usually #1 Singles 22%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.09
Bethany Downs
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.99
Kyndra McCrillis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Kharyssa Brown
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
2.90
Ashley Blair Simpson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Anna Catherine Cargile
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Erin Cosse
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Cindy Cope
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Jo Margaret Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Shelli Chupik
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yerenia Adame Hernandez + Bethany Downs3352% games+4.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacey Watts
32W–14L career · 10 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Holly Caruthers
23W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Yerenia Adame Hernandez
22W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Bethany Downs
41W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Kyndra McCrillis
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kharyssa Brown
22W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Ashley Blair Simpson
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Anna Catherine Cargile
16W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Erin Cosse
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Cindy Cope
5W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Jo Margaret Bennett
15W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Margaret Jackson
6W–12L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelli Chupik
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.