Teams

CM BLUE

2025 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-18Won 30
W#1 DoublesMegan Draper / Megan Robert vs Katrina Benes / Jana Wilkinson7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Ammann / Kathleen Gormley vs Tolly Tate / Carron Loftus6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Donovan / Delores Dafoe vs Molly Rudnick / Constance Rapson6-4, 6-3
2025-06-11vs SKY BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesMegan Draper / Kathy Ammann vs Camilla Almuti / Becky McBride1-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs PTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Madsen / Hannah Sloven vs Alyson Tittman / JESSICA MORTON4-6, 4-6
2025-05-28vs CHCC NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Gormley / Leslie Madsen vs Holly Garnsey / Courtney Berglund3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-25vs CP REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathleen Gormley / Leslie Madsen vs Teri Hetzel / Tiffany Putimahtama2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHannah Sloven / Megan Robert vs Marianne Lapuyade / Karen Schuster6-1, 6-2
2025-05-21vs DTC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesMegan Draper / Megan Robert vs Tina Friedman / Sarah Sexton6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Madsen / Hannah Sloven vs Sheri Jacobs / Cherlyn Linden6-4, 7-5
2025-05-14vs DTC REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Gormley / Leslie Madsen vs Brenda Byrne / Jennifer Parsons4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Megan Draper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Kathy Ammann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Kathleen Gormley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Leslie Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.53
Megan Robert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.40
Melissa Alzubaidi
published
2.23
Kay Teitelbaum
published
Hannah Sloven
published
Tracy Donovan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Robert + Leslie Madsen314 matchesnot enough data
Kay Teitelbaum + Melissa Alzubaidi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Draper
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Kathy Ammann
55W–59L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Kathleen Gormley
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Leslie Madsen
37W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
3
Megan Robert
60W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Melissa Alzubaidi
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
Kay Teitelbaum
20W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Hannah Sloven
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Donovan
6W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.