Teams

Buffalo One

2023 18&Over Men · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-05vs Western: B-Lo BallersLost 13
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Jacob Hofmar-Glennon vs Ashvin Tadakamalla / Joseph Fahey5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMatt Hahnemann / Souma Chowdhury vs Sanjeev Relan / Gabor Mechtler3-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesSergio Quevedo vs Michael O'Leyar0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / Naveen Selvaraj vs John LeMar / Roberto Zambrano6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-28vs WilbonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSouma Chowdhury / Naveen Selvaraj vs Ronald White / Nicholas Davis6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJames Glennon / Jacob Hofmar-Glennon vs Jeffery Amplement / Gordy Sage6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJim Higgins vs Eric Breindel1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKamu Pindiprolu / Yang Xiao vs Turhan Wilbon / Ryan Wills2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-14vs Western: B-Lo BallersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Jacob Hofmar-Glennon vs Damian Courtin / Gabor Mechtler7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNaveen Selvaraj vs Raymond Cooley6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYang Xiao / Murray Richardson vs Mark Witzleben / Sanjeev Relan5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Hahnemann / Sergio Quevedo vs Roberto Zambrano / Krystian Drozd6-3, 6-3
2023-06-07vs WilbonLost 13
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Jacob Hofmar-Glennon vs Meidong Wang / Ronald White5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Hahnemann / Glenn Snowden vs Alexander Shotell / Turhan Wilbon4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNaveen Selvaraj vs Nicholas Davis3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSouma Chowdhury / Jim Higgins vs Jeffery Amplement / Ryan Wills6-2, 6-0
2023-05-24vs Western: B-Lo BallersLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Glennon / Jacob Hofmar-Glennon vs Christopher Streb / Sanjeev Relan4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSergio Quevedo / Matt Hahnemann vs Gabor Mechtler / Damian Courtin3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesYang Xiao / Souma Chowdhury vs Ryan Maher / James Horne7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: B-Lo Ballers42191127259
2Wilbon32131231231
3Buffalo One1481738257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Jacob Hofmar-Glennon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.70
Souma Chowdhury
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Glenn Snowden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Yang Xiao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
James Glennon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.47
Sergio Quevedo
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.19
Kamu Pindiprolu
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jim Higgins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Matt Hahnemann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Murray Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Naveen Selvaraj
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kamu Pindiprolu + Jim Higgins1736% games+4.6% vs expected
James Glennon + Jacob Hofmar-Glennon111952% games+2.9% vs expected
Kamu Pindiprolu + Sergio Quevedo1735% games+0.6% vs expected
Jim Higgins + Sergio Quevedo0531% gamesnot enough data
James Glennon + Glenn Snowden134 matchesnot enough data
Jim Higgins + Naveen Selvaraj314 matchesnot enough data
Kamu Pindiprolu + James Glennon033 matchesnot enough data
Kamu Pindiprolu + Souma Chowdhury123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jacob Hofmar-Glennon
44W–45L career · 5 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
Souma Chowdhury
51W–56L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.70
Glenn Snowden
28W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.62
Yang Xiao
101W–78L career · 3 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
James Glennon
67W–97L career · 5 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Sergio Quevedo
51W–95L career · 3 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Kamu Pindiprolu
58W–115L career · 6 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Jim Higgins
50W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Matt Hahnemann
18W–15L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Murray Richardson
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Naveen Selvaraj
32W–23L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.