Teams

Rockledge - Phipps

2022 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-21vs Rockledge - MelendezSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJane Bonvillain / Kim Johnson vs Jeannette Cintron / Carol Becker1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarja Welsh / Julia Tulloch vs Sherry Houston / Nancy Hastings6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-28vs TTC - UrbanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Rene Hurst-Wall vs Shayna Gleckel / Katharine Polvino3-6, 1-6
2022-02-14vs Fee - BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Rene Hurst-Wall vs Michele Heyn / Lynne Schettino-DeFelice2-6, 6-7
2022-02-07vs Suntree - McLaughlinLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Kim Johnson vs Ann Passmore / Sandra Rowe1-6, 0-6
2022-01-31vs TTC - UrbanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristel Phipps / Jane Bonvillain vs Katharine Polvino / Amy McIntosh2-2, 0-0
L#2 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Ellen Sells vs Jill Hogan / Mary Beardall1-6, 2-6
2022-01-24vs RCCB - RosenquistLost 01
L#3 DoublesKristel Phipps / Julia Tulloch vs Melissa Rosenquist / Teresa Blair7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2022-01-17vs Rockledge - MelendezSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRene Hurst-Wall / Jane Bonvillain vs Marie Forte / Brenda Knox2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Donna Urbanek vs Carol Becker / Arletha White5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-01-12vs Brevard - Kiwi / RamseySplit 11
L#2 DoublesJane Bonvillain / Rene Hurst-Wall vs Anne Ramsey / Leesa Brambach0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJulia Tulloch / Kim Johnson vs Tina Murphy / Betty Schaub6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Beatrice Barlet
published 3.5
3.51
Donna Urbanek
published 3.5
3.19
Cheryl Wadsworth
published 3.5
3.16
Kim Johnson
published
3.12
Xu Sue Huang
published
2.95
Julia Tulloch
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.68
Jane Bonvillain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Rene Hurst-Wall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Urbanek + Kim Johnson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beatrice Barlet
100W–104L career · no lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Donna Urbanek
11W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Cheryl Wadsworth
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Kim Johnson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Xu Sue Huang
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3
Julia Tulloch
97W–101L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Jane Bonvillain
42W–78L career · 4 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
Rene Hurst-Wall
7W–8L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.