Teams

TThomas/KGriffin (Sardis)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-12vs MCollins/KHoracek (Lifetime)Won 10
W#2 DoublesErin Zelickson / Kendra Treece vs Mary Collins / Ashley Whitley6-2, 6-4
2023-05-05vs ASchmitt (Olde Providence)Won 10
W#2 DoublesErin Zelickson / Emily Battle vs Stacey Lee / Tiffany Eby6-1, 6-1
2023-04-21vs KShute/ATrexler (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKatie Ferry / Judy Kilduff vs Elizabeth Ridler / Allie Trexler6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTracy Thomas / Erin Zelickson vs Jennifer Remsen / Kate Kirschner6-2, 6-1
2023-04-13vs LShelton (BCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesJudy Kilduff / Kendra Treece vs Margit Etzel / Linda Shelton6-3, 6-1
2023-03-22vs AIannuzzi/MSevigny (Carmel)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKate Johnson / Erin Zelickson vs Erin Conklin / Melissa Kreager5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJudy Kilduff / Lindsay Thompson vs Gina Arado / Jennifer Harrison2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-17vs TMiller/DMaguire (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Shirey / Erin Zelickson vs Shirley Butterworth / Lisa OBryan6-2, 6-3
2023-03-09vs HGriffith/AReynolds (CSRC)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesErin Zelickson / Tracy Thomas vs Amy Ingalls / Leah Zanville2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Thompson / Judy Kilduff vs Rachael Dunnavant / Amy Reynolds3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
3.49
Kendra Treece
published 3.5
3.40
Erin Zelickson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.35
Emily Battle
published
3.10
Katie Ferry
published
2.98
Judy Kilduff
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Elizabeth Tabor
published
Christine Shultz
published 3
2.63
Kate Johnson
published
2.58
Dana Demick
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Annaliese Anderson
100W–44L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.82
3.5
Kendra Treece
62W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Erin Zelickson
82W–27L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Emily Battle
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
Katie Ferry
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.10
3
Judy Kilduff
48W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
2.98
Elizabeth Tabor
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Christine Shultz
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Johnson
12W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%18%82%
2.63
3
Dana Demick
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.58

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.