Teams

Hills/A. Tebbutt

2022 Hillsborough Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.44 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-08-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesNatalia Illich / Abby Kronk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-11vs HCC Causing A Racquet - A. FlinterLost 01
L#3 DoublesMelissa Sheridan / Abby Kronk vs Andrea Fajardo / Julie Martin1-6, 2-6
2022-07-28vs HCC Combo 8.5 - J. GarlickLost 01
L#3 DoublesLynn O'Brien / McKenzie O'Brien vs Janel Hutchinson / Jennifer Drukteinis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-13vs HCC Combo 8.5 - J. GarlickWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalia Illich / Olivia Rivas vs Meagan Brandriff / Kristy Wilander7-5, 7-5
2022-07-12vs HCC Causing A Racquet - A. FlinterLost 01
L#2 DoublesMcKenzie O'Brien / Lynn O'Brien vs Julie Martin / Andrea Fajardo2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Angie Jones
published 4.5
Alice Hagan
published 4.5
Asbel Giang
published 4.5
Jamie Hamilton
published 4.5
4.19
McKenzie O'Brien
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Abby Kronk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Olivia Rivas
published
4.12
3.72
Melissa Sheridan
published
3.70
Lynn O'Brien
published
3.69
Natalia Illich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Joann Suyao
published
3.62
Michelle Meyer
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Jones
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
4.37
4.5
Alice Hagan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Asbel Giang
7W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jamie Hamilton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
McKenzie O'Brien
74W–59L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Abby Kronk
69W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
Olivia Rivas
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
4.5
Elaine Aschenbrenner
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
Melissa Sheridan
24W–8L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Lynn O'Brien
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Natalia Illich
80W–53L career · 2 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Joann Suyao
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Michelle Meyer
7W–18L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.