Teams

Dobrinsky

2025 Hampton Roads Singles · Hampton Roads Singles 4.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-03vs Sabalburo - REIGNSplit 11
W#1 SinglesNoah Dobrinsky vs Chris Sabalburo6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDillon Bradshaw vs Angelo Mosquera2-6, 6-7
2025-11-19vs Bautista - f-bombersLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndre Rogers vs Ryan Bautista3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDillon Bradshaw vs Thomas Allen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNoah Dobrinsky vs Steven South2-6, 2-6
2025-11-12vs Sabalburo - REIGNLost 12
W#1 SinglesDillon Bradshaw vs Chris Sabalburo6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAndre Rogers vs Michael Erguiza3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesNick Petrillo vs Tyrone Wilson3-6, 4-6
2025-11-02vs Bautista - f-bombersLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndre Rogers vs Thomas Allen1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesTodd Detweiler vs Steven South4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesNoah Dobrinsky vs Ryan Bautista0-6, 0-6
2025-10-22vs Sabalburo - REIGNWon 21
W#1 SinglesNick Petrillo vs Chris Sabalburo6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesDillon Bradshaw vs Michael Erguiza6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesAndre Rogers vs Tyrone Wilson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-15vs PierceLost 12
W#1 SinglesDillon Bradshaw vs Justin Pierce7-5, 7-5
L#2 SinglesTodd Detweiler vs Matthew Mazzoni6-0, 5-5
L#3 SinglesNoah Dobrinsky vs Chris Livingston3-6, 4-6
2025-10-08vs Bautista - f-bombersLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndre Rogers vs Steven South4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesNick Petrillo vs Ryan Bautista0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesNoah Dobrinsky vs Danilo Angeles2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Singles 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Dillon Bradshaw
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.69
Andre Rogers
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.61
Noah Dobrinsky
usually #3 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Nick Petrillo
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Todd Detweiler
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andre Rogers + Dillon Bradshaw123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dillon Bradshaw
11W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Andre Rogers
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.69
Noah Dobrinsky
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Nick Petrillo
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Detweiler
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.