Teams

2026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Wilson - Tanoan

2026 USTA Adult 65 & Over League - NNM · 7.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 10 9:00 AM
Sierra Vista West Tennis Complex
Sep 17 11:00 AM
Tanoan Country Club
Sep 24 9:00 AM
Albuquerque Academy Tennis Courts
Oct 8 10:00 AM
Forked Lightning Racquet Club
Oct 15 11:00 AM
Tanoan Country Club
Oct 22 9:00 AM
Jerry Cline Tennis Center
Oct 29 11:00 AM
Tanoan Country Club
L#1 DoublesEllen Herbertson / Janet Dosher vs Marianne Dwight / Leaann Knight4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Wilson / Havi Graeber vs Robyn Weiss / Carol Ydens3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJT Schneider / Diana Filliman vs Pam Crain / Nell Sale1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
12026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Guttierez - JC000000
22026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Sale - FL000000
32026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Erikson - AA000000
42026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Russell - SV000000
52026 Adult 65 & Over 7.0W Wilson - Tanoan000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Lisa Sly
published
3.34
Ellen Herbertson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Havi Graeber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
JT Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.74
Diana Filliman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ellen Dufault
published
Janet Dosher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laurel Worth
published
Rhonda Letz
published
Sally Lane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laurel Worth + Lisa Sly3347% games+1.6% vs expected
Diana Filliman + JT Schneider11951% games−8.3% vs expected
Rhonda Letz + Diana Filliman5159% gamesnot enough data
Sally Lane + Ellen Herbertson3257% gamesnot enough data
Laurel Worth + JT Schneider3252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Sly
102W–58L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.47
Ellen Herbertson
82W–44L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
Havi Graeber
68W–120L career · 1 line in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
JT Schneider
33W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Diana Filliman
121W–79L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
Ellen Dufault
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Janet Dosher
52W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laurel Worth
35W–57L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Letz
102W–112L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sally Lane
57W–33L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.