Teams

Houstman-Ciulla/Bentonville/KTC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-29vs Malayappan/Bentonville/KTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesReed Fraser / Deric Neal vs Palanivel Kalimuthu / Vimal Arasu Malayappan7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMudit Agrawal / Brandon Morrison vs NITHIYANANDHAN GANESAN / Silambarasan Paramasivam6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJohn Ciulla / Jonathan Wells vs Irfan Ali / Santhosh Srinivasan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-25vs Zhang/Rogers/KTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Hawron / Reed Fraser vs Litao Yin / Guanghao Lin6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndy Stoner / Jaime Valdes vs Xiaojie Zhang / Ethan Yu6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLogan Imhoff / Kamren Roelke vs Junze Zhang / Xitong Hu7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-08vs Zhang/Rogers/KTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Hawron / Christopher Howard vs Sam Chen / Guanghao Lin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Houstman / Andy Stoner vs Xiaojie Zhang / Junze Zhang6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKamren Roelke / Logan Imhoff vs Xitong Hu / Patrick Chen5-7, 6-7
2026-06-25vs Colucci-Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Hawron / SANDEEP KANAMALA vs Brent Jimenez / Jeremiah McLaughlin6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEdward Houstman / Brandon Morrison vs Tr Rose / Brendan Fitzpatrick6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJohn Ciulla / Logan Imhoff vs Tanner Coleman / John Colucci6-4, 6-2
2026-06-20vs Malayappan/Bentonville/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSANDEEP KANAMALA / Deric Neal vs Vimal Arasu Malayappan / Palanivel Kalimuthu6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrandon Morrison / Jaime Valdes vs NITHIYANANDHAN GANESAN / Silambarasan Paramasivam2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJonathan Wells / John Ciulla vs Irfan Ali / Santhosh Srinivasan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-10vs Colucci-Gagliardo/Rogers/SVCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristopher Howard / SANDEEP KANAMALA vs Ahmed Khan / Brent Jimenez6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEdward Houstman / Mudit Agrawal vs Joseph Gagliardo / Nicholaa Colucci6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJonathan Wells / John Ciulla vs Ruthwik Akula / Joe Gagliardo6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Houstman-Ciulla/Bentonville/KTC5111719168
2Zhang/Rogers/KTC0621632214

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
SANDEEP KANAMALA
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Deric Neal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Paul Hawron
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Jonathan Wells
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Edward Houstman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Christopher Howard
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.96
Jaime Valdes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Andy Stoner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Brandon Morrison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Logan Imhoff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Mudit Agrawal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
John Ciulla
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Kamren Roelke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Reed Fraser
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Logan Imhoff + Kamren Roelke3245% gamesnot enough data
Jaime Valdes + John Ciulla134 matchesnot enough data
John Ciulla + Jonathan Wells123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SANDEEP KANAMALA
25W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Deric Neal
36W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Paul Hawron
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Jonathan Wells
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.13
Edward Houstman
10W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Christopher Howard
10W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.98
Jaime Valdes
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Andy Stoner
6W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Brandon Morrison
10W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Logan Imhoff
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Mudit Agrawal
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
John Ciulla
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Kamren Roelke
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Reed Fraser
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.