Teams

Burt

2021 Anne Arundel Combo · Combo Women 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-10-14vs MartinLost 01
L#2 DoublesMasako Murphy / Lisa Thompson vs Dina Caddeo / Margaret Condit6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-10-03vs MartinLost 01
L#3 DoublesAshley Doot Vaughn / Masako Murphy vs Jenny Lopez / Anne Bolduc5-7, 3-6
2021-09-26vs Double the FunWon 10
W#2 DoublesMasako Murphy / Lisa Dennis vs Mia Piansay / Lisa Killelea6-4, 6-4
2021-09-19vs WilliamsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoanne Connelly / Lezlie Moreland vs Elizabeth Sellars / LaShonne Barnes6-2, 7-5
2021-09-12vs Party at the NetLost 01
L#3 DoublesLezlie Moreland / Lisa Dennis vs Kristen Eckenrode / Feliz Steele6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-08-29vs WilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoanne Connelly / Lezlie Moreland vs Skeeta Narciss / Shyrelle Eubanks6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTami Burt / Masako Murphy vs Tammi Molavi / Jennifer Sheridan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2021-08-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanne Connelly / Lezlie Moreland vs Heather Dessalines / Margaret Condit5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2021-08-22vs Party at the NetLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoanne Connelly / Masako Murphy vs Tara Okieffe / Lisa Mendenhall2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Helen Patterson
published 4
3.54
Joanne Connelly
published
3.45
Jill Lehr
published
3.35
Lezlie Moreland
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Mary Wallace
published
3.22
Tami Burt
published
3.15
Masako Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Ashley Doot Vaughn
published 3.5
Sharon Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lezlie Moreland + Masako Murphy3549% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Helen Patterson
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
Joanne Connelly
2W–13L career · no lines in 2021
37%63%<1%
3.54
Jill Lehr
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
>99%<1%<1%
3.45
3.5
Lezlie Moreland
157W–166L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.35
Mary Wallace
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.29
Tami Burt
4W–11L career · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.22
3.5
Masako Murphy
132W–138L career · 5 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Ashley Doot Vaughn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
Sharon Foster
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.