Teams

Knight

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 55 & over · Women 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Gardner/GoreWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Phelps / Hope Conway vs Julie Cooke / Natasha Hilburn6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKaren McCarty / Miriam Thompson vs Deedee Greene / Barbara Taylor6-2, 6-1
2026-08-17vs Gardner/GoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren McCarty / Anne Egger vs Loretta Lestrange / Dawn Lynch7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCoo Hocker / Elizabeth Claus vs Natasha Hilburn / Julie Cooke6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Cooper / Lee Ann Zierenberg vs Debra Jones / Scharme Prevost6-1, 6-4
2026-08-12vs Gardner/GoreWon 30
W#1 DoublesSonya Young / Lee Ann Zierenberg vs Loretta Lestrange / Julie Cooke6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren McCarty / Elizabeth Palmer vs Elizabeth Gardner / Judi Leseur6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Phelps / Elizabeth Claus vs Dawn Lynch / Barbara Taylor6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 8.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Knight2060243
2Gardner/Gore02061271

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
Telfair Belangia
published
4.22
Coo Hocker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Katrina Knight
published
4.01
Karen McCarty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.00
Sonya Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Lee Ann Zierenberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.90
Elizabeth Claus
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Margie Shuffler
published
3.88
Lisa Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Miriam Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Anne Egger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Hope Conway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen McCarty + Anne Egger6154% games−3.6% vs expected
Coo Hocker + Katrina Knight4155% gamesnot enough data
Anne Egger + Lee Ann Zierenberg314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Telfair Belangia
12W–0L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Coo Hocker
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Katrina Knight
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
Karen McCarty
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Sonya Young
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
51%49%<1%
4.00
Lee Ann Zierenberg
35W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.92
Elizabeth Claus
35W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.90
Margie Shuffler
24W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.89
Lisa Phelps
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.88
Miriam Thompson
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Anne Egger
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Hope Conway
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.