Teams

Martin

2024 Anne Arundel Tri-Level 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.56 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-09-16vs Keegan/WalshWon 21
W#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Savannah Bergen vs Elizabeth Jacobson / Amy Dawson6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesJenny Lopez / Kristin Draper vs Marilyn Moore / Dale Clark6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMary Corbiere / Cynthia Wofford vs Tracy Seybert / Marina Anglim5-7, 5-7
2024-09-12vs Lady Strikers TriLost 01
L#3 DoublesTeresa Taylor / Cynthia Wofford vs Roshni Fifadra / Aklil Getachew4-6, 3-6
2024-09-08vs ANNE ARUNDEL - ArnoldLost 03
L#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Xenia Baranova vs Brandie Sparr / Lisa Thompson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Stephanie Mackowiak vs Belinda McLean / Melissa Donato7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Corbiere / Peggy Bailey vs Sadie Simpson / Tosha Clark4-6, 3-6
2024-08-27vs Lady Strikers TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesXenia Baranova / Helen Patterson vs Gia Jang / Stephanie Riley6-2, 6-3
2024-08-25vs Keegan/WalshWon 20
W#2 DoublesJenny Lopez / Stephanie Mackowiak vs Lisa Walsh / Lezlie Moreland6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeggy Bailey / Cynthia Wofford vs Stephanie Ruskin / Alexandra Bray6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-20vs Tami TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Jenny Lopez vs Lisa Thompson / Brandie Sparr6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCynthia Wofford / Laura Lewandowski vs DIANE CASANOVA / Jennifer Baldwin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-11vs Keegan/WalshLost 12
L#1 DoublesDina Caddeo / Catherine Jeans vs Joi Remoll / Sara Wagner0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMasako Murphy / Stephanie Mackowiak vs Lisa Walsh / Dale Clark6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPeggy Bailey / Cynthia Wofford vs Tracy Seybert / Marina Anglim2-6, 1-6
2024-08-05vs ANNE ARUNDEL - ArnoldWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaren Francis / Dina Caddeo vs Arina Kravitz / Rachel Price1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Mexcur / Masako Murphy vs Melissa Donato / Laura Laabs3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Corbiere / Teresa Taylor vs Tosha Clark / Sadie Simpson2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-03vs Lady Strikers TriLost 12
L#1 DoublesSavannah Bergen / Xenia Baranova vs Kathy Crowley / Stephanie Riley4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJenny Lopez / Kristin Draper vs Ay Rothany Koballa / Yngrid Sierra6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTeresa Taylor / Mary Corbiere vs Roshni Fifadra / Courtney Laughlin1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Tri-Level 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Xenia Baranova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Helen Patterson
published
3.64
Stephanie Mackowiak
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Savannah Bergen
published
3.50
Dina Caddeo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Karen Francis
published
3.35
Cindy Mexcur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Masako Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Kristin Draper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Laura Lewandowski
published
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
2.95
Cynthia Wofford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Peggy Bailey
published
2.59
Mary Corbiere
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Mexcur + Masako Murphy3450% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Stephanie Mackowiak314 matchesnot enough data
Mary Corbiere + Cynthia Wofford033 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Mexcur + Dina Caddeo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Xenia Baranova
204W–68L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
Helen Patterson
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Stephanie Mackowiak
72W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.64
Savannah Bergen
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Dina Caddeo
138W–170L career · 5 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Karen Francis
57W–66L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Cindy Mexcur
161W–156L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Masako Murphy
130W–138L career · 2 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kristin Draper
39W–76L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Laura Lewandowski
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.12
Rebecca Sellassie
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Cynthia Wofford
178W–137L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Peggy Bailey
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Mary Corbiere
67W–148L career · 4 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.59

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.